Get Expert Help with [x,l^2] Differential Solution | File Attached

  • Thread starter Thread starter mudyos
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on seeking help with a differential solution involving derivatives. The responder emphasizes the importance of using commutator rules and suggests writing operators in a specific form, such as \hat{L}_z = x\hat{p}_y - y\hat{p}_x. They provide hints on utilizing the commutation relations [x_i, \hat{p}_j] = iħδ_{i,j} to aid in the solution. The responder clarifies that they will not provide complete solutions but rather guidance to help the original poster work through the problem. The emphasis is on the original poster taking responsibility for solving the problem with the provided hints.
mudyos
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi

I can not Continues Solution because of the differentiate .

please

I want Some the helping and Exposition .

see a file attach
 

Attachments

  • L.jpg.jpg
    L.jpg.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 495
Physics news on Phys.org
Solution please
 
Skip the derivatives, you where on the right way by writing \hat{\vec{L}} as \hat{L}_x^2 + .. and using the commutator rules and the commutators [x,\hat{L}_x] etc.

Hint: Use the fact that you can write \hat{L}_z = x\hat{p}_y - y\hat{p}_x etc, and [x_i,\hat{p}_j] = i\hbar \delta _{i,j} ; where \vec{x} = x,y,z. So x_i can be either x,y,z.

Much work ;)

Dont demand solutions from us, we only give you hints and point you in the right direction. That is also a rule, that full solutions shoulnd be posted. We would also be sitting approx 45min to do this, and it is not us who should do the work, it is you, we only give hints as I said.

Now you have everything to solve this.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top