Getting a tutor to help you solve physics or mathematics problems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the appropriateness of seeking external tutoring help for homework assignments. A teacher permits students to use tutors for understanding problems, as long as they express solutions in their own words and can explain their reasoning. This raises questions about the limitations imposed by some professors who only allow questions directed at them or teaching assistants. Participants argue that there is a significant difference between receiving direct answers from a tutor and being guided through problem-solving strategies. Many believe that utilizing a tutor for hints or similar problems is a reasonable approach to learning, especially when a student's learning style does not align with that of the professor or TA. The conversation highlights the importance of finding effective learning methods and suggests that collaboration with peers or tutors is often essential for grasping complex material.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1
Hi.
This may seem strange because I don't know about laws of cheating in every country.
When our teacher assigns us a homework he says it's ok to get an outside tutor to help you understand the problem provided that when we write the solution we do it in our own way and be able to explain it. Is this the main stream of courses because other professors only allow you to ask questions to them or the TA but you know this seems like whining that I rather bring me a tutor with the teaching style I like and not be confined to two people.
What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think, and I hope others agree, that there is a distinct difference from when a tutor gives you an answer or a tutor gives you hints or strategies to solving the problem. Or even the tutor giving you a similar problem and going through that step by step. You are probably smart enough to know when you're just copying an answer or trying to figure it out. So even if a professor explicitly says "you can only get help from me or the ta" - which seems odd enough for frankly professors only care about,at best, you understanding the material - I say go ahead and do what you need to do to learn the most efficiently. Big brother isn't watching you - its simply about learning, and just that.
 
It seems completely reasonable to be able to see a tutor for advice on how to solve problems. It also seems ridiculous to limit you to only talking to the prof or TA: In my experience it's basically expected that you'll be working with your peers on most of the problems.
 
Replace "solve" with "understand" in the title, and you're good to go.
 
Oh I see thank you for your replies.
Did it occur to anyone here an incident where he/she found that he cannot understand the materials completely from the prof or ta because their teaching styles weren't suitable for him so he had to get a tutor?
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top