Getting N-methyl-2-aminobutane from 2-aminobutane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ace.
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the structural equation for synthesizing N-methyl-2-aminobutane from 2-aminobutane. Participants point out that the initial attempt incorrectly represents 2-aminobutane and includes methane, which cannot participate in the reaction. It is emphasized that the drawn product has a trivalent carbon and four bonds to nitrogen, which is not chemically valid. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate chemical representations in organic synthesis. Overall, the participants stress the need for correct structural formulas to ensure proper understanding of the reaction.
Ace.
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


draw structural equation for going from 2-aminobutane to N-methyl-2-aminobutane

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Code:
CH3=CH-CH2-CH3   + CH4  ---->   CH3-CH-CH2-CH3
       |                                   |
       NH2                          CH3-NH2
It doesn't really balance so what must I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't have to balance - it is a pretty standard procedure to ignore byproducts in such schemes.

But what you draw is not a 2-aminobutane, and your product has a trivalent carbon.
 
And methane (CH4) is not capable of this reaction. Also, there are 4 bonds to nitrogen.
 
Ace. said:

Homework Statement


draw structural equation for going from 2-aminobutane to N-methyl-2-aminobutane


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Code:
CH3=CH-CH2-CH3   + CH4  ---->   CH3-CH-CH2-CH3
       |                                   |
       NH2                          CH3-NH2
It doesn't really balance so what must I do?

Except for CH4 which you seem to have corrected, all your organic formulae are wrong in more than one point.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top