Insights Getting Started with Solar System Imaging - Comments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the optimal timing for solar system imaging, emphasizing the importance of capturing planets when they are fully illuminated, particularly at opposition for outer planets and near conjunction for inner planets. It clarifies that outer planets do not exhibit significant phases like the inner planets and the moon. Additionally, the conversation touches on solar activity cycles, noting that solar cycles last approximately 11 years. Participants appreciate the insights shared and suggest improvements for clarity. Overall, timing and understanding planetary phases are crucial for effective solar system imaging.
NFuller
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
659
Reaction score
241
Greg Bernhardt submitted a new PF Insights post

Getting Started with Solar System Imaging
solarimaging.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and Greg Bernhardt
Astronomy news on Phys.org
overall good :smile:
well done

just a couple of comments

When to Image:
Some times are better than others for capturing images of SSOs. The planets go through phases like the moon and you will want to image them when they are fully illuminated. This occurs at opposition for Mars and the outer planets and near conjunction for the inner planets.
Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/getting-started-solar-system-imaging/

You could make your above statement a little clearer.
The outer planets don't go through significant phases like the inner planets and the moon do
A changing from gibbous to full phase can reasonably easily be detected for Mars but for Jupiter and beyond
most observers wouldn't see any change

The Sun’s activity goes through 10 year cycles called solar cycles.
Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/getting-started-solar-system-imaging/

the small solar cycle is 11 years :smile:
(the full one is 22 years)Dave
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and Greg Bernhardt
davenn said:
overall good :smile:
well done

just a couple of comments

When to Image:
Some times are better than others for capturing images of SSOs. The planets go through phases like the moon and you will want to image them when they are fully illuminated. This occurs at opposition for Mars and the outer planets and near conjunction for the inner planets.
Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/getting-started-solar-system-imaging/

You could make your above statement a little clearer.
The outer planets don't go through significant phases like the inner planets and the moon do
A changing from gibbous to full phase can reasonably easily be detected for Mars but for Jupiter and beyond
most observers wouldn't see any change

The Sun’s activity goes through 10 year cycles called solar cycles.
Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/getting-started-solar-system-imaging/

the small solar cycle is 11 years :smile:
(the full one is 22 years)Dave
Thanks davenn, Thank you for pointing this out! I will fix and clarify these points.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt and davenn
I think it's interesting how time of day/night and date all factor in when the optimal time to photograph something in the sky. I wouldn't have thought to factor it.
 
  • Like
Likes NFuller
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
311
Views
51K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top