Graduate Getting structure data from a partition function?

Click For Summary
The partition function in classical statistical physics serves as an averaging tool rather than a mathematical transform with an inverse. It encapsulates macroscopic properties but does not provide detailed information about individual particle configurations or their positions. Specifically, knowing the partition function Z(β) does not allow for the reconstruction of the positions of other particles in the system. This highlights the distinction between macroscopic averages and microscopic details in statistical mechanics. The discussion emphasizes that while the partition function is fundamental, it cannot trace back to specific atomic arrangements.
maajdl
Gold Member
Messages
391
Reaction score
29
Hello,

From wikipedia, this is the partition function for a "classical continuous system":

1563798282228.png


This is the pillar of classical statistical physics, but it can be seen as a mere kind of "mathematical transform" .
It can be used even without thinking to statistics or temperature.
If we focus only on the potential energy part of this integral, then

H = V(q)

is a function of q and the "positions of all other particles" of the system.

I question myself:
Would the full knowledge of Z(β) contain the full information about the "other particles".
And therefore, could the knowledge of Z(β) be traced back (inverted) to the positions of the atoms?

I hope this question doesn't look too fancyful.
I find it interresting because it would cast geometrical data in a 1-variable function Z(β) !

Thanks for your suggestions!

Michel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Certainly no. Partition function is not a mathematical transformation (like Fourier) which has an inverse. It's more like averaging with weight given by the Hamiltonian. If you know the average, you cannot reconstruct the numbers that were averaged.

Moreover, partition function doesn't describe one particular configuration of the system. It is averaging through a domain in the phase space. Consider for example an ensemble of identical particles that have momenta but otherwise do not interact. Then the Hamiltonian has only kinetic part

##H = \sum\limits_i \frac{p_i^2}{2\, m}##

Then integral over dq gives just a trivial constant. Partition function does not serve to reconstruct details about microscopic quantities, only macroscopic ones.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K