Gibbs Free Energy: Work in H-TS Explained

AI Thread Summary
Gibbs free energy (G) is defined as G = H - TS, where H represents enthalpy and TS is the temperature-entropy product. When creating a system from a volume of zero at constant pressure and temperature, the work required is represented by G, not just heat (Q). Enthalpy accounts for the total energy needed to establish the system, including work done against atmospheric pressure. The Gibbs free energy allows for some energy input from the environment as heat, which is essential for maintaining constant temperature during the process. Thus, G reflects the net energy needed to create the system while considering external contributions.
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
the gibbs free energy is defined to be H-TS. In my thermo book, it says that if i were to create a system out from volume V=0 at constant pressure and temperature, the work that i would need to provide is G=H-TS. But for constant pressure i thought the work terms in enthalpy canceled out and were zero and that all that was left was the heat (Q), i thought that's what made the enthalpy quantity useful. why then does the H-TS quantity have work in it? ie, i thought H-TS would just be Q-TS but apparently it's not.. why is this not true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have
$$
G = H - TS = U + PV - TS
$$
Considering that you are creating a system from nothing, enthalpy is the total energy you will have to furnish to create the system and puch away the atmosphere to make place for it. With the Gibbs free energy, you can consider that you do not have to furnish all the energy, as some can come from the environment in the form of heat (assuming constant temperature). So, when creating a system from nothing, ##G## is what you need to supply to create the system at ##T=0## and puch away the atmosphere to make room for it, considering that the environment will take care of bringing it to the right temperature.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top