Gibbs Free Energy: Explained & Explored

AI Thread Summary
Gibbs energy, represented as G = H - TS, is the total energy available in a system at constant temperature and pressure, making it crucial for analyzing isothermal and isobaric processes. The change in Gibbs free energy (ΔG = ΔH - TΔS) determines whether a process is spontaneous, depending on the sign of ΔG. It is particularly significant in open systems or chemical reactions where particle numbers vary. The relationship between Gibbs energy and chemical potentials is expressed as G = Σ Ni μi, highlighting the extensive nature of particle numbers. Understanding Gibbs energy is essential for evaluating the feasibility of thermodynamic processes.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
I don't think I completely understand what Gibbs energy is, Is it the work you can get out of a system at fixed Temperature and pressure. Does anyone have another angle on it cause It seems weird to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Gibbs free energy is the total energy available to a system, G = H-TS, and is used instead of other free energies such as the Helmholtz free energy (I think there are others as well) when the system undergoes isothermal and isobaric processes. The Helmholtz free energy is more applicable for isothermal and isochoric processes.

Processes that result in a change in the Gibbs free energy ΔG = ΔH-TΔS are classified as "spontaneous" or not depending on the sign of ΔG.
 
ok thanks for your answer.
 
Gibbs free energy is especially important once varying particle numbers are considered, i.e. open systems or chemical ractions. The reason is that of the natural variables T,p, {N_i} only on the particle numbers N_i are extensive variables. By the theorem on homogeneous functions,
G=\sum_i N_i \mu_i i.e. it can be expressed in terms of the chemical potentials of the components.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top