Given mass, distance, and time, calculate power

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathMajor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Power Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the power exerted by a weightlifter lifting a 50kg barbell over a distance of 1.2m in 1.5 seconds. One participant calculated the power as 392 Watts by incorporating gravitational acceleration, while their professor claimed the answer is 40 Watts based on a simplified work calculation. The correct approach requires converting mass to force using gravity, confirming that 392 Watts is indeed the accurate power output. Participants emphasize the importance of using proper units and calculations in physics problems. The consensus supports the calculation of 392 Watts as the correct answer.
MathMajor
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How much power does a weightlifter expend when lifting a 50kg barbell a distance of 1.2m in a time interval of 1.5s?

Homework Equations



Power=work done/time interval (in Newton meters per second or Watts)
Work=Fd (in Newton meters or Joules)


The Attempt at a Solution


Power = Fd/t = (m)(a)(d)/t = 50kg(9.8 m/s2)(1.2m)/1.5s = 392 Nm/s = 392 W

This is how I solved the problem, but my professor said the correct answer is 40 Watts!
Work = force x distance; work = 50 kg x 1.2 m, work = 60
Power = work /time; 60/1.5 = 40 Watt

Can someone please verify which way is correct? I am sticking by my answer of 392 Watts
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathMajor said:

The Attempt at a Solution


Power = Fd/t = (m)(a)(d)/t = 50kg(9.8 m/s2)(1.2m)/1.5s = 392 Nm/s = 392 W

This is how I solved the problem, but my professor said the correct answer is 40 Watts!
Work = force x distance; work = 50 kg x 1.2 m, work = 60
Power = work /time; 60/1.5 = 40 Watt

'50kg' is a mass and not a force, it must be correctly multiplied by acceleration (gravity in this case) to convert it to a force. You are correct.
 
Ok, so you are sure the correct answer is 392 Watts? I feel like I will be shunned for going against the professor, but I have to go with my gut on this one.

Thanks!
 
MathMajor said:
Ok, so you are sure the correct answer is 392 Watts? I feel like I will be shunned for going against the professor, but I have to go with my gut on this one.

Thanks!

I didn't check over your answer, but I am quite sure that 'kg' is a unit of mass and not force.
 
I agree. Thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top