Given range and angle - but not time - find initial velocity?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the initial velocity required for a missile to achieve a range of 9500 km, the optimal launch angle is 45 degrees, and gravity's effect is considered at -9.8 m/s². The equation R = Vo²/g*sin(2*θ) is suggested for calculating initial velocity, but initial attempts yielded unreasonably low speeds. After correcting unit conversions, a more realistic velocity of approximately 9.65 km/s was achieved. Accurate unit management is emphasized as crucial for solving such physics problems. The discussion highlights the importance of proper calculations and unit conversions in projectile motion scenarios.
exi
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given a missile with 9500km range, what must its initial velocity be to travel that distance? Disregard issues introduced by the missile's boost phase, and state the velocity as km/h.

(Presumably, the curvature of the planet is to be ignored, as well.)

Homework Equations



Unsure; see below.

The Attempt at a Solution



If a missile is to have maximum range, then its launch angle ought to be 45°. It would also have a symmetrical trajectory and is affected by gravity at -9.8 m/s^2 (or 0.0098 km/s^2 in the terms of this problem).

The first thing that came to mind was to use R=Vo^2/g*sin(2*45) and solve for Vo, but that yielded something ridiculously slow for that long of travel.

I'm rather unsure as to which equation(s) ought to be used to solve such a problem, since everything I can find written in my notes refers to what appear to be slightly different situations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
exi said:
The first thing that came to mind was to use R=Vo^2/g*sin(2*45) and solve for Vo, but that yielded something ridiculously slow for that long of travel.
What did you get?
 
Doc Al said:
What did you get?

I did it the first time without converting acceleration and had 300something km/h, or 186 mph.

The second time with the conversion worked out to like 93.1 km/h, which ... well, a 57 mph missile isn't going to travel 6,000 miles. :mad:
 
You might want to redo your calculation--you're way off. Be sure you use standard units and then convert to km/h.
 
Doc Al said:
You might want to redo your calculation--you're way off. Be sure you use standard units and then convert to km/h.

Yeah, so I am. 9.6488 km in a second sounds more like it (and is correct). Looks like my bad habit of neglecting units in figures bit me in the ass for once.

Thanks again. This place is becoming my home away from physics lecture home, I swear.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top