Given this formula, is this formula true by symmetry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bjnartowt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Symmetry
bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



I know that,
\left[ {f(x),p} \right] = {\bf{i}}\hbar \frac{{df}}{{dx}}

By symmetry, is it also true that,
\left[ {f(p),x} \right] = {\bf{i}}\hbar \frac{{df}}{{dp}}

...since x and p are just symbols?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. These are commutators, and the symbols aren't just placeholders, they actually mean something. Almost everything in quantum mechanics has a meaning that can change based on how you associate that meaning to something else. That is why operators that commute have such a high importance, the overall meaning of what you are doing doesn't change between the two operators that commute.

[f(x),p]g=-i*h*\frac{d}{dx}(f*g)+ihf*dg/dx = -ih(gdf/dx+fdg/dx-fdg/dx)= ihgdf/dx

The g's go away and you get your answer. (btw, the stars aren't convolutions, just multiplication)

So then work out the next one in a jiffy.

[f(p),x]g=f*x*g-g*f*x=0
 
Well... according to my calculations, it is true that
\left[f(p),x\right] = i\hbar\frac{\mathrm{d}f}{\mathrm{d}p}
but not just because of symmetry. I'll second what Mindscrape wrote about the symbols not being just placeholders; they do have particular meanings.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top