Is Medical Physics the Right Path for a 2:1 MSci Physics Graduate in the UK?

AI Thread Summary
Medical physics is a viable career option for a 2:1 MSci Physics graduate in the UK, though it requires additional training through an IPEM-accredited program, potentially including an MSc or PhD. Entry-level positions typically involve routine quality assurance duties for those with only a bachelor's degree. The field offers a promising balance of clinical work and research, leading to stable, well-paying jobs. Understanding the UK grading system, a 2:1 denotes an upper second class degree, which is different from the US grading system. Pursuing medical physics can be a lengthy process, but it is considered a rewarding path.
neu
Messages
228
Reaction score
3
I've just got a 2:1 MSci in Physics and I weighing up my options. I'm seriously considering going into Medical physics for various reasons; although I've only done one medical physics module in my course. I've looked into it and I'd obviously have to do an additional training on a programme accredited by the IPEM (and maybe an MSc/PhD). I was wondering if anyone had any insight into the world of a medical physicist in the NHS or possibly other career paths.

The whole things a bit of a pipe dream at the moment, as my circumstances have changed very quickly, and I've only really considered this option recently, hence my ignorace.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Out of curiosity, what does 2:1 mean?

Generally to work as a medical physicist the minimum education you'll need is an M.Sc. Jobs available to those with a bachelor's degree are usually at the level of physics assistant which involve a lot of routine QA duties.

Medical physics offers great career potential in my opinion as there's a decent balance between clinical duties (which translates into stable, well-paying jobs) and research. The road however is a long one.
 
A 2:1 is an upper second class degree.
>70% = 1
60-69% = 2.1
50-59% = 2.2
40-49% = 3rd

Is it different in the US? I thought it was the same.
 
neu said:
A 2:1 is an upper second class degree.
>70% = 1
60-69% = 2.1
50-59% = 2.2
40-49% = 3rd

Is it different in the US? I thought it was the same.

Nope. Different system. I'm not even sure the theoretical grades are equivalent.

We go on a (usually) four point GPA system. 2.0 (C = 70%) is "average", 3.0 (B = 80%) is "above average", 4.0 (A=90%) is "significantly above average".

We (U.S.) are fighting with grade inflation here, where some schools or individual teachers give way more A/B grades than is justified by student performance. Some of us actually monitor our class statistics and try to give appropriate A/B/C/D/F grades. I'm one of the ones that monitors carefully.
 
Are the grades curved?
 
In the US? Depends on the teacher/instructor. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. And what kind of curve and how it is applied can vary.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top