Got a question with substitution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MRAI
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Substitution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around using the Substitution method to maximize the expression 4x - 2xy + 3y under the constraint 4x - y = 2. The initial steps involve substituting y with 4x - 2 into the original equation. Participants suggest differentiating the resulting expression with respect to x to find critical points for maximum or minimum values. However, there is a debate on whether this problem is calculus-based or not, with some advocating for the use of the Lagrange method as a more elegant solution. Ultimately, the conversation highlights different approaches to solving optimization problems in mathematics.
MRAI
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Using the Substitution method, find the maximum value of

4x-2xy+3y subject to the constraint 4x-y=2

I can do the 1st part:

4x-y=2--->
4x-2=y

substitute this into the original equation:
4x-2x(4x-2)+3(4x-2)

Hope that right so far! but don't know where to go from there? anyone could help please?

thanks ;)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
then you differentiate wrt x and equal to zero to find max/min
 
what do u mean by wrt?
 
"wrt" : "with respect to"
CartoonKid was assuming this was a calculus problem. The standard method for solving "maximum- minimum" problems in calculus is to differentiate and set the derivative equal to 0. But since you apparently weren't aware of that, I suspect this is not a calculus problem!

If you multiply y= 4x-2x(4x-2)+3(4x-2) out, you get a quadratic. If you are doing problems like this, I presume you know how to complete the square to find the vertex of the graph which, in this problem, gives you the maximum value.

So: multiply this out, then complete the square.
 
This method is totally counterproductive...The method discovered by Lagrange is much more elegant...

Daniel.
 
But one would need a rather intermediate mathematical background to use them...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top