Got wrong from right equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prasanna Suman
  • Start date Start date
Prasanna Suman
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I got this problem while I was combining relativistic equations:



For particle which is in motion,
v = l /t
or, l = v * t
or, l= v * t0/(1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2) ' Relativistic equation for time "t"

If the particle was light,

l =(c * t0)/(1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2) ' Because velocity of light is always c; c*t0 is equal to l0

or l = l0 / (1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2)

But, the actual relation is l = l0 * (1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2)

I must have been wrong somewhere. Where?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should have been consistent when plugging v--->c in your equations.

Daniel.
 
use lorentz-einstein transformation

Prasanna Suman said:
I got this problem while I was combining relativistic equations:



For particle which is in motion,
v = l /t
or, l = v * t
or, l= v * t0/(1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2) ' Relativistic equation for time "t"

If the particle was light,

l =(c * t0)/(1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2) ' Because velocity of light is always c; c*t0 is equal to l0

or l = l0 / (1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2)

But, the actual relation is l = l0 * (1-v^2/c^2)^(1/2)

I must have been wrong somewhere. Where?

Your light signal that starts at t=0 from x=0 generates the event after a time t of propagation (x=ct;t=x/c) in I. The same event detected from I' is (x'=ct';t'=x'/c) and so
l=(x-Vt)/(1-bb)^1/2=l'((1+b)/(1-b))
with b=V/c.
the best things a physicist can offer to another one are information and constructive criticism
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top