GPS and Relativity: Impact of Time Dilation on Earth and Satellites

  • Thread starter Thread starter stevebd1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gps Relativity
stevebd1
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
747
Reaction score
41
Due to the blogs being removed, I thought it might be worthwhile posting a few in the forums-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQdIjwoi-u4


Time dilation due to gravity (GR)-

d\tau=dt\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r}}

where M=Gm/c^2

Time dilation due to velocity (SR)-

d\tau=dt\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}

Quantities-

Earth's mass- 5.9736e+24 kg

Earth's (mean) radius- 6.371e+6 m

Satellite's altitude- 2e+7 m

Satellite's velocity- 3.889e+3 m/s

86400 seconds in a day


Difference due to gravity-

dT sat (r=6.371e+6 + 2e+7)- 0.999999999833
dT Earth (r=6.371e+6)- 0.999999999304

difference- 0.000000000529

Time dilation on Earth relative to satellite is 4.562265e-05 seconds per day or 45.62265 microseconds


Difference due to velocity-

dT sat (v=3.889e+3)- 0.999999999916
dT Earth- 1 (0.999999999999 at the equator, i.e. ~1)

difference- 0.000000000084

Time dilation on satellite relative to Earth is 7.26931e-06 seconds per day or 7.26931 microseconds


Total time dilation- 38.35334 microseconds per day on Earth, atomic clocks on satellites need to be slowed down to match atomic clocks on Earth.



The ISS-

altitude- 2.78e+5 to 4.6e+5 m

velocity- 7701.11 m/s

The time dilation on the ISS relative to Earth is between 24.35197 and 25.8877 microseconds a day (depending on the altitude) meaning the atomic clocks on the ISS have to be speeded up to match those on Earth in contrast to the GPS satellites (which means that since its inception in 1998, the ISS has traveled forward in time by approx. 0.1 of a second).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A few comments:

(1) You didn't mention it, so I don't know if you are taking into account that an object on the Earth's equator has a nonzero velocity (at least in the frame you appear to be using for your calculations, in which the Earth is assumed to be spherical and non-rotating). Since ##v \approx 450## in SI units, the correction to dT(Earth) is only in the twelfth decimal place, but I think it's still worth mentioning.

(2) For objects that are in free-fall orbits, you can use the formula for orbital velocity in terms of Earth's mass and the orbital radius to get a formula that takes both velocity and altitude into account:

$$
d\tau = \sqrt{1 - \frac{3 G m}{c^2 r}}
$$

(3) It's worth noting that the correction due to the non-sphericity of the Earth is just a smidgen too small to appear in your calculation; it appears in the thirteenth decimal place (this is the correction due to the Earth's quadrupole moment). This illustrates why approximating the Earth as spherical works so well; even in a calculation this precise, non-sphericity can be ignored for many purposes (since the correction is well under 1 percent of the overall value).
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
103
Views
5K
Replies
31
Views
6K
Replies
132
Views
8K
Back
Top