GPS - Doubt regarding RMC speed value in NMEA files

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the "speed" value in the RMC sentence of NMEA files, specifically whether it represents speed over ground as a 2D measurement or a 3D speed. It clarifies that this speed is calculated using Doppler shift for accuracy, typically exceeding 0.5%, while cheaper receivers may rely on less precise position changes. Participants express a need for comprehensive manuals or datasheets to better understand GPS data, noting that the NMEA standard is often not freely available and varies by device. They recommend looking for specific GPS chip datasheets, like the SiRFstar III, for more detailed information. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and nuances of interpreting GPS speed data from NMEA files.
Roughmar
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am afraid that this is either too specific and\or that this is in the wrong forum (if the latter is the case, if moderators could change this, I'd appreciate :).

I'm trying to do an application that uses the GPS data that comes from NMEA files.

On a particular sentence (RMC) there is a value indicating "speed". After looking about it, I found a place that described this speed as in "Speed over ground, Knots".

I have two doubts regarding this value:

Exactly what does it mean? Is it the speed having the ground as a reference, or a projection on the ground, making it a 2D speed (not caring about differences in the altitude.)?

Also, how accurate is it? How is it calculated?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's just the normal speed, the over-ground bit is because it's often used by aircraft to distinguish it from airspeed (which depends on winds).

Most reasonable receivers calculate it directly from the incoming signal wavelength (essentially the doppler shift) and it should be accurate to > 0.5%
A cheap receiver might calculate it from change in position per second which is much less accurate.

I suppose it's essentially the straight line speed in 3D
 
Thank you for the speedy answer. =)

While I'm here I'll ask just one more thing: is there a manual or datasheet where this info is?
Sometimes I have doubts regarding the imprecision of certain aspects and find it cumbersome to google for each specific thing every time it happens. Having a .pdf with all the info would be great, but I don't know what to look for.
 
There are lots of books about GPS.
And the GPS chip will have a datasheet - if you know which one it is, the SiRFstar III is about the most common.

But the device it's in will have it's own computer which might add/remove features. Some makers also put extra data in their own proprietry format rather than NMEA.

The NMEA standard is pay-for information but you can find lots of copies of it, and anyway individual products implementation is a bit sketchy. There is an opensource library that will read almost all versions http://nmea.sourceforge.net/
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top