GPS satellite and satnav receiver clock synchronisation

AI Thread Summary
GPS satellites transmit signals containing identification, timestamps, and positional data, which receivers use to calculate distance based on time differences. The accuracy of the receiver's clock is crucial for precise distance measurements, yet the receiver initially lacks knowledge of its distance from the satellites. To address this, it is assumed that the receiver's clock is consistently offset, allowing for adjustments based on the intersection of signals from multiple satellites. This method helps minimize errors in determining the receiver's position. Advances in GPS technology have significantly improved accuracy, with some systems achieving precision within 5mm.
quitequick
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
As far as I understand it...

Each satellite transmits a signal that the receiver receives. This signal consists of (at least) a satellite identification together with a time-stamp of when the signal was sent and its position at that time. The receiver calculates the distance from the satellite by comparison of the time-stamp to its own internal clock (distance = speed-of-light x time-difference). With three different satellite signals the intersection of three spheres can be found and therefore the position of the receiver.

So, the accuracy of the receiver's clock against the satellite's clocks would seem to be critical - in fact fundamental to the accuracy of the distance measurement. But if the receiver does not know exactly how far away the satellite is, how could it accurately compensate for the delay in receiving a time synchronisation signal? Assuming that the receiver does not have an on-board atomic clock, any clock it does have will have to be sync'ed probably very regularly.

So the question is, how is the receiver's clock sync'ed to the GPS satellite's clocks, given that the receiver does not know far away the satellite is, so it can correct for the time-delay?

Sounds like a chicken and egg problem to me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System#Navigation_equations

It seems that it is just assumed the clock is wrong by some amount, but wrong by the same amount during the time interval in which the signals from the different satellites arrive, which is probably a good estimate considering the small time interval. Then they just fit the time error of the clock such that the four spheres intersect in a single spot, or try to minimize the variation of the intersection point considering all the spheres or some other method.
 
quitequick said:
Thanks, chingel. The Wikipedia page lead me to...

http://web.archive.org/web/20110719232148/http://www.macalester.edu/~halverson/math36/GPS.pdf

which explains it thoroughly.

interesting paper, thanks for the link

I'm the tech working for a company that's sells GPS gear into the survey and heavy machine industry ... road construction, mining etc
I have to admit that, even working with precision GPS equip all day every day, there's still lots I don't know about the GPS basics. ( mainly because it isn't essential to repairing the equip)

I had to giggle with that 80metre accuracy comment in the opening lines.
we are now easily down to less than 10mm ( 1cm) 5mm is quite achieveable using 2 linked receivers

Dave
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
13K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
126
Views
6K
Replies
31
Views
6K
Back
Top