Can Gravity Be Understood as a Gauge Theory Through Rovelli's LQG Approach?

Klaus_Hoffmann
Messages
85
Reaction score
1
GR as a Gauge theory ??

don't know if this is true or not, but i have been reading books by ROvelli (LQG) or 'Gauge theories' the question is could we study Gravity as the set of functions A_{\mu}^{I}(x)

Then we write the Einstein Lagrangian (or similar) as:

\mathcal L = F_{ab}^{I}F^{I}_{ab} (sum over I=0,1,2,3)

F_{ab}= \partial _{a}A^{I}_{b}-\partial _{b}A^{I}_{a}-\Gamma_{jk}^{i}A_{j}^{I}(x) A_{k}^{I}(x)

I think Rovellli in his LQG theory used this representation... then (\partial_{0}A_{\mu}^{I} is the Kinetic part of Lagrangian and

dA_{\mu}^{I} (d- exterior derivative) represents the potential.

then how would it read the Einstein Field equation and the Riemann or similar tensors ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you can formulate gravity in that way. However, then the Lagrangian is not quadratic in F, but linear in F. In addition, you have one additional independent field - the tetrad (corresponding to the metric tensor itself), which does not have an analog in Yang-Mills theories. Having two independent fields, you obtain two set of equations of motion. One is the Einstein equation, while the other is a relation between the connection A and the metric derivatives. In the absence of matter, this relation is the same as in GR. In the case of matter with spin, the connection gets additional terms, describing geometry with torsion. This is the so-called Einstein-Cartan theory of gravity.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top