A GR Unphysical Aspects: Time Protection Hypothesis & Riemannian Curvature

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter jk22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gr
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
As history is Newton considered infinite speeds of his gravitational force as unphysical, out of which Einstein constructed relativity.

In special relativity moving faster than c induces an imaginary space-time and is hence ruled out.

My question is regardin towards GR, in which Gödel showed that in rotating universes solutions to GR closed time-like loops could exist.

Are those also ruled out by physics community due to the time protection hypothesis ?

I suppose yes. Then by looking at the construction of GR, is it that the construction of the Riemannian curvature transport is made out of parallel transporting a vector along a closed curve ?

This seems unphysical to build a theory out of closed loops in space-time.

So how could other calculations of the curvature be made on helix-like curves ? I'm looking for documents about this particular point.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To define the curvature tensor completely, you must use curves that have nothing to do with histories of particles, e.g. spacelike curves, and curves that mix timelike and spacelike, including having sections with different time orientations. This has nothing whatsoever to do with whether the manifold admits closed timelike curves.

As to whether CTCs are unphysical, that is ultimately a matter of opinion. I think they are, others will disagree.
 
jk22 said:
by looking at the construction of GR, is it that the construction of the Riemannian curvature transport is made out of parallel transporting a vector along a closed curve ?

A closed curve, but not a closed timelike curve. The closed curve will not be timelike everywhere. In fact it won't even have to be a smooth curve; the typical examples used in GR textbooks are closed loops composed of distinct segments, which are not smooth at the corners where different segments meet.
 
jk22 said:
Then by looking at the construction of GR, is it that the construction of the Riemannian curvature transport is made out of parallel transporting a vector along a closed curve ?

This seems unphysical to build a theory out of closed loops in space-time.

Another approach could probably be taken to define the Riemann curvature.
Rather than thinking about parallel-transport around a loop,
think about parallel-transporting from event A to event B along two different paths.

In classical mechanics, the analogue is
rather than computing the work done around a loop,
compute the work done from point A to point B along two different paths.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top