GR vs SR: Reconciling Contravariant & Covariant Vector Components

nigelscott
Messages
133
Reaction score
4
I am trying to reconcile the definition of contravariant and covariant
components of a vector between Special Relativity and General Relativity.

In GR I understand the difference is defined by the way that the vector
components transform under a change in coordinate systems.

In SR it seems that it is more of a notational thing that allows for the
derivation of the invariant interval.

How are the 2 things related?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have a source for the different treatment in SR? It can be made to look like it's just a notational thing in SR by using Minkowski coordinates where ##g_{\mu\rho}=g^{\mu\rho}## so many of the differences between contravariant and covariant components disappear - but that's just taking advantage of the fact that flat spacetime is an especially nice special case (which is why we call it "special" relativity).

It's a good exercise to choose some perverse coordinate transform in which the metric acquires off-diagonal and non-constant components even in flat space-time, work a few otherwise-easy problems in those coordinates, just so that you can see the machinery working. You'll find that the contra/co distinction appears even in SR.
 
OK, soon after I posted I realized that the connection is through the metric tensor.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top