Schools Grad School with minimal research

AI Thread Summary
When applying to graduate school for physics, having a patent and some research experience, even if limited, can be advantageous. Admissions committees generally do not expect applicants to have extensive research backgrounds, especially in their specific field of interest. A GPA of 3.5 is solid, and while an 830 on the physics GRE may be on the lower side, the unique experience of working in R&D and holding a patent can enhance an application. It is recommended to highlight both the patent and any research experience in application materials, as these elements demonstrate initiative and practical skills. Other factors, such as undergraduate institution and letters of recommendation, will also play a significant role in the admissions process.
eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I'm looking to get into grad school for physics, but I've done very little research. I did a little bit of astrophysics research early in my college career and a little bit in the field I want to pursue (nanobiosensor stuff), but nothing substantial.

However, after college, I did work in an R&D group for a medical devices company and came up with a product for which I now have a patent.

My question is, if I focus on this in my application and my essay and whatnot, is this something admissions committees will look at in a favorable light? Or would it be better to try to do some academic research first before applying to grad school. I have like a 3.5 physics gpa and an 830 on my pgre.

Thanks a lot ahead of time for any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not too knowledgeable about this because I am just an undergrad, but I wouldn't feel too bad about your prospects. Many students have no research experience, so the fact that you have some is good. No grad school expects you to have already done research in the field you want to pursue, because they usually don't even expect you to know what field you want to pursue. It's also impressive that you have a patent. Other things matter too though, where you went for undergrad, letters of rec, etc. I would discuss the little research experience you have, as well as the patent.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top