Grade 11 musical instrument project

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a Grade 11 project involving the creation of chime bars, where the initial bar produced a frequency of 410 Hz at a length of 42 cm. The students aimed to create a second bar with a target frequency of 493.92 Hz by cutting a 35 cm piece, but it unexpectedly produced a frequency of 570 Hz. The conversation highlights the potential errors in calculations and the importance of using the correct equations, specifically that frequency is inversely proportional to the square of the length of the chime. The participants explore the implications of using different materials and the possibility of the pipe being closed at one end, which could affect the frequency produced. The discussion emphasizes the need for accurate measurements and understanding of acoustic principles in their project.
ta4294
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Grade 11 musical instrument project need help!

Homework Statement


I am making chime bars for my project.
My partner and I were working on it today and we cut our first chime bar and used visual analyzer to figure out the frequency of sound produced by hitting our first chime bar. We found that it was 410 Hz (using Visual analyzer 2011) (it soudned very close to an A flat when we compared it to an online tuning fork). We the measured the length of our chime bar and it was 42 cm exactly. We then wanted to produce a chime bar that had a frequency of 493.92 ( a B). We cut another piece of pipe of length 35 cm which is what we determined using the F1L1=F2L2 formula . ( (410Hz)(42cm)=(493.92Hz)(L2) , we then solved for L2 which was approximately 34.9 cm) After cutting the new copper pipe at 35cm, we tested its frequency on Visual analyzer 2011. We had used the exact same type of pipe that we had cut our first A flat chime bar from (they both came from the same 6foot sample ) we were holding both of them at their nodes, and we were hitting the chime bar with the same material at their respective antinodes. But the frequency of our 35cm bar came out at 570 Hz which was way off our calculations. I was wondering what might have gone wrong?


Homework Equations



f1l1=f2l2
f=frequency l=length

The Attempt at a Solution


(410Hz)(42cm)=(493.92Hz)(L2)
L2=34.86

Yet chime bar of L2 produces a frequency of 570 Hz not 493.92
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Basically I see 2 possibilities.

1. You used a different pipe (material, thickness, diameter).

2. You made a mistake in the length.
If I calculate the length that corresponds to 570 Hz, I get 30 cm.
Since it was supposed to be 35 cm, that kind of looks like a mistake of exactly 5 cm...
 


I like Serena said:
Basically I see 2 possibilities.

1. You used a different pipe (material, thickness, diameter).

2. You made a mistake in the length.
If I calculate the length that corresponds to 570 Hz, I get 30 cm.
Since it was supposed to be 35 cm, that kind of looks like a mistake of exactly 5 cm...


i cut both chime bars (the first one and the second one ) BOTH from the same piece of 6 foot pipe that i bought at the store. I measured my cut piece and it was in fact 34.8 and producing a sound of 570Hz instead of your proposed 30 cm which I agree is what should be the "theoretical value" according to the calcuation. i was looking aroudn the internet and foudn this equation that proposes that L2/L1= square root(f1)/ square root(F2) ... so basically is length inversely proportionate to the root of the frequency? I tried working the numbers out and when L2= 42* ( sqrt(410)/sqrt (570)) <-- (rearranged the aforementioned formula and solved for L2, plugging in the variables that stated in my original problem) i got 35.5! which makes sense because my 35 cm bar was producing 570 Hz... HAVE I BEEN USING THE WRONG EQUATION THE ENTIRE TIME?!
 


Yep, looks like you've been using the wrong equation. The frequency is inversely proportional to the square of the length of the chime, or
F_1 {L_1}^2 = F_2 {L_2}^2
which is essentially the 2nd equation you found.
 


eumyang said:
Yep, looks like you've been using the wrong equation. The frequency is inversely proportional to the square of the length of the chime, or
F_1 {L_1}^2 = F_2 {L_2}^2
which is essentially the 2nd equation you found.

and is this true for like everything? stupid question i know but were learning sound waves and our teacher told us that it was a linear inverse relationship between the frequency and length of something? or is this equation only for chime bars... (i have a feeling its not)
 


ta4294 said:
i cut both chime bars (the first one and the second one ) BOTH from the same piece of 6 foot pipe that i bought at the store. I measured my cut piece and it was in fact 34.8 and producing a sound of 570Hz instead of your proposed 30 cm which I agree is what should be the "theoretical value" according to the calcuation. i was looking aroudn the internet and foudn this equation that proposes that L2/L1= square root(f1)/ square root(F2) ... so basically is length inversely proportionate to the root of the frequency? I tried working the numbers out and when L2= 42* ( sqrt(410)/sqrt (570)) <-- (rearranged the aforementioned formula and solved for L2, plugging in the variables that stated in my original problem) i got 35.5! which makes sense because my 35 cm bar was producing 570 Hz... HAVE I BEEN USING THE WRONG EQUATION THE ENTIRE TIME?!

I've looked it up on wikipedia and found the following article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_resonance.
It seems to me that the ratio between length and frequency is linear.

In the article you can see that an "open" pipe of negligible diameter has a resonance frequency of:

f = \frac {n v} {2 L} = \frac {n \times 343 \frac m s} {2 \times 0.42 m} = n \times 408 Hz

where n is a positive integer (n=1,2,3,...).

This matches your initial measurement with a chime of length 42 cm and with the "root" tone.

For a length of 35 cm we get:

f = \frac {n v} {2 L} = \frac {n \times 343 \frac m s} {2 \times 0.35 m} = n \times 490 Hz

which matches what you were trying to achieve.

Is it possible your pipe is for instance "closed" on one end?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Back
Top