Gradient vector property proofs

fastXattack
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the operation of taking the gradient of a function has the given property. Assume that u and v are differentiable functions of x and y and that a, b are constants.


Homework Equations


Δ = gradient vector

1) Δ(u/v) = vΔu - uΔv / v^2

2) Δu^n = nu^(n-1)Δu


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried taking the partial derivative of (u/v) and separating the terms but I didn't get the ending result.

For 2, I don't even know where to begin because it is an exponent.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fastXattack said:

Homework Statement


Show that the operation of taking the gradient of a function has the given property. Assume that u and v are differentiable functions of x and y and that a, b are constants.


Homework Equations


Δ = gradient vector

1) Δ(u/v) = vΔu - uΔv / v^2

2) Δu^n = nu^(n-1)Δu


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried taking the partial derivative of (u/v) and separating the terms but I didn't get the ending result.

For 2, I don't even know where to begin because it is an exponent.
Let's try a simpler problem:
\nabla(uv) = v\nabla{u} + u\nabla{v}

\nabla(uv) = <\frac{\partial (uv)}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial (uv)}{\partial y}>
= <u\frac{\partial v}{\partial x} + v\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}, u\frac{\partial v}{\partial y} + v\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}>
= u< \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}> + v< \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} > = u\nabla{v} + v\nabla{u}
 
Last edited:
I was given that problem for homework as well and I was able to do that one. I have an idea on how to do the quotient rule one, but no idea for the second question.
 
If (2) is to be done for n a positive integer, use induction on n.
 
This is my attempt at the quotient rule proof. Did I do the correct thing for this problem at least? I'm still unsure how to do the second question...
 

Attachments

  • photo.JPG
    photo.JPG
    27.5 KB · Views: 1,902
Yes, that looks fine although the second line is difficult to read.

For the other problem, use induction (the tacit assumption is that n is a positive integer). The base case is easy to establish.
\nabla u^1 = \nabla u = 1 \nabla u

Now assume that for n = k,
\nabla u^k = k \nabla u^{k - 1}

To complete the proof, show that for n = k + 1
\nabla u^{k + 1} = (k + 1) \nabla u^k
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top