Grand Canonical Partition Function and Adsorption Statistics

Arjani
Messages
20
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider a two dimensional surface on a three dimensional crystal. This surface has M positions that can adsorb particles, each of which can bind one particle only and an adsorption does not affect the adsorption on nearby sites. An adsorbed particle has energy ε and an empty site has energy 0.

(Question A and B come here, but I could answer those.)

The surface is now considered to be in diffusive and thermal equilibrium with a gas of temperature T and chemical potential μ, so the energy E and the number of adsorbed particles can now vary.

c) Calculate the grand canonical partitition function \mathcal{Z_1} (T, \mu) of one adsorption position and then the grand canonical partition function for the entire surface \mathcal{Z_M} (T, \mu).

d) Calculate the chance P(T,\mu) that one adsorption position is taken.

Homework Equations



\mathcal{Z} = \sum e^{\beta(\mu N_i - E_i)}

The Attempt at a Solution



So for \mathcal{Z_1} (T, \mu), N = 1 and E_i = 0 or E_i = \epsilon and so

\mathcal{Z_1} = \sum e^{\beta(\mu - E_i)} = e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)} + e^{\beta(\mu - 0)} = e^{\beta \mu}(e^{-\beta \epsilon} + 1)

This is my solution. However, I read that you have to take N = 0 for E_i = 0 and N = 1 for E_i = \epsilon, resulting in \mathcal{Z_1} = e^0 + e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)}, so I'm confused. What is correct here?

As for \mathcal{Z_M}, I'm not sure how to go about that. Can you do something like this?

\mathcal{Z_M} = \sum_{i=0}^{M} e^{\beta N_i} \sum_{i=0}^{\epsilon} e^{- \beta E_i}

d) This is simply P = \frac{e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)}}{\mathcal{Z_1}}?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Arjani said:

Homework Equations



\mathcal{Z} = \sum e^{\beta(\mu N_i - E_i)}

Think about what the summation index is here.

The Attempt at a Solution



So for \mathcal{Z_1} (T, \mu), N = 1 and E_i = 0 or E_i = \epsilon and so

\mathcal{Z_1} = \sum e^{\beta(\mu - E_i)} = e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)} + e^{\beta(\mu - 0)} = e^{\beta \mu}(e^{-\beta \epsilon} + 1)

This is my solution. However, I read that you have to take N = 0 for E_i = 0 and N = 1 for E_i = \epsilon, resulting in \mathcal{Z_1} = e^0 + e^{\beta(\mu - \epsilon)}, so I'm confused. What is correct here?

The summation is over all allowed values of ##N##, namely ##N = 0## for no particle absorbed at the site and ##N = 1## for one particle absorbed at the site. You didn't quite handle the ##N_i=0## case correctly in the expression \mathcal{Z} = \sum e^{\beta(\mu N_i - E_i)}. You should get the result that you stated from your reading.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top