Graph of Position Seems to be Wrong

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating relative velocities and positions of particles in different coordinate systems. The user successfully solved parts A and B, determining the velocities relative to each coordinate system, but struggles with part C regarding the graphical representation of motion. They express confusion over the integration result, which suggests particles are moving apart over time, contrary to their circular motion. Clarifications are provided about the interpretation of coordinate systems and the significance of the velocity terms in the equations. The conversation concludes with an understanding that while certain terms may be zero, their notation in calculations should be carefully considered.
GoCubs12
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



By relative velocity, we mean velocity with respect to a specified coordinate system. (The term velocity, alone, is understood to be relative to the observer’s coordinate system.)

(a) A point is observed to have velocity Va relative to coordinate system A.What is its velocity relative to coordinate system B, which is displaced from system A by distance R? (R can change in time.)

(b) Particles a and b move in opposite directions around a circle with angular speed ω, as shown. At t = 0 they are both at the point r = lˆj, where l is the radius of the circle. Find the velocity of a relative to b.

(c) Sketch the motion of the particle.

Homework Equations



Theta=wt

The Attempt at a Solution



I was able to solve part A and found Va=Vb + dR/dt. I'm pretty confident in this answer.

I was also able to solve part B. I found dR/dt to be 2wlcos(wt). I then plugged this into the answer from part A and got Va=Vb + 2wlcos(wt). I'm pretty confident in this answer as well.

My issue is with part C. To graph the position, I integrated the answer from part B and got Rx=Vbt+2lsin(wt). I believe I did this right, but if you graph it the sin function does not go linearly across the graph as it normally does, but instead gradually increases due to the Vbt term in front of it. This does not seem to make sense in the real world because the particles are going around a circle so they should not be gradually getting farther apart over time? I'm pretty stumped on this. Any input about this would be appreciated.

Thanks for all the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GoCubs12 said:
My issue is with part C. To graph the position, I integrated the answer from part B and got Rx=Vbt+2lsin(wt). I believe I did this right, but if you graph it the sin function does not go linearly across the graph as it normally does, but instead gradually increases due to the Vbt term in front of it.

If we are assuming particle B's coordinate system places (at all times) particle B at the origin of that system, then particle B's velocity in that system is zero.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
If we are assuming particle B's coordinate system places (at all times) particle B at the origin of that system, then particle B's velocity in that system is zero.

So since particle B's position would always be (0,0), it could just be left out of all the equations then? Including in part A?
 
GoCubs12 said:
So since particle B's position would always be (0,0), it could just be left out of all the equations then? Including in part A?

No. In part a), I interpret the phrase "coordinate system B, which is displaced from system A by distance R" to mean the origin of coordinate system B is displaced from the origin of coordinate system A by displacement vector R. That does not imply that when we do computations of a particle's velocity that we always assume the particle is at the origin of one of the coordinate systems.

In the special case where a problem asks about something "relative to particle A", it usually means we do use a coordinate system where the particle is at the origin of "its" coordinate system.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
No. In part a), I interpret the phrase "coordinate system B, which is displaced from system A by distance R" to mean the origin of coordinate system B is displaced from the origin of coordinate system A by displacement vector R. That does not imply that when we do computations of a particle's velocity that we always assume the particle is at the origin of one of the coordinate systems.

In the special case where a problem asks about something "relative to particle A", it usually means we do use a coordinate system where the particle is at the origin of "its" coordinate system.

Thanks that helps a lot. Also, in part B it is talking about being relative to particle B so the Vb term could be left out since it would imply that it is 0?
 
GoCubs12 said:
Thanks that helps a lot. Also, in part B it is talking about being relative to particle B so the Vb term could be left out since it would imply that it is 0?

The way I'd phrase it is that the Vb is zero so the Vb term has no effect. "Left out" implies something about notation, which may or may not get the approval of a grader.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
The way I'd phrase it is that the Vb is zero so the Vb term has no effect. "Left out" implies something about notation, which may or may not get the approval of a grader.

Thanks for all the help!
 
Back
Top