MHB Graph |z| > 3 on the Complex Plane: A Detailed Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raerin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
Raerin
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I have no idea where to post this.

How to graph |z| > 3 on the complex plane? A detailed explanation of how the graph shall look like would be very nice :D

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello,
|z| means length of z from origin, so the length of the circle is greater Then 3
Regards,
$$|\pi\rangle$$
 
I understand that, but I have no idea how the graph should look like. I don't know how to draw it to illustrate that the radius is greater than 3.
 
Raerin said:
I understand that, but I have no idea how the graph should look like. I don't know how to draw it to illustrate that the radius is greater than 3.
I think the simplest way to graph this is to draw the circle |z| = 3, then shade the outside of the circle. It's not perfect, but it gets the idea across.

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top