Graphing functions and identifying features

  • Thread starter Thread starter zebra1707
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Graphing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on graphing the functions y=-e^(-2x) and y=ln(x-2)+1. For the first function, it's suggested to analyze the behavior of e^x, which approaches 0 rapidly for x<0 and increases quickly for x>0, recommending a range of x from -2 to 5. The logarithmic function is only defined for x>2, so a range of 2 to 10 is advised. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding graph transformations and suggest using a graphing calculator for quicker insights. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for confidence in graphing techniques and the utility of calculators in visualizing functions.
zebra1707
Messages
106
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi there

I need assistance with two graphs that are causing me some problems

y=e(^-2x)(-1) and y=ln(x-2)+1

Homework Equations



I just need some guidence as to where to start - starting with a table - what range is approriate?

The Attempt at a Solution



Stuck
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e^x goes to 0 very rapidly for x< 0 and goes up very rapidly for x> 0. I would recommend taking x from -1 or -2 to +4 or +5.

ln(x) is only defined for x> 0 so ln(x- 2) is only defined for x> 2. I would recommend taking x from 2 up to, say 10.

Wouldn't it have been faster to just play around with some numbers rather than wait for someone to respond here? Do you not have a graphing calculator? It would have taken only a few seconds to try various value on a calculator.
 
zebra1707 said:

Homework Statement



Hi there

I need assistance with two graphs that are causing me some problems

y=e(^-2x)(-1) and y=ln(x-2)+1

Homework Equations



I just need some guidance as to where to start - starting with a table - what range is appropriate?

The Attempt at a Solution



Stuck
I assume you mean \displaystyle y=(-1)e^{-2x}\,, which you could write as y = (e^(-2x))(-1), (the location of parentheses is important) or y = -e^(-2x), or better yet, y = -e-2x,

and y = ln(x-2) + 1 .

Are you familiar with the graphs of:
\displaystyle y=e^{x}\,,​
and
\displaystyle y=\ln(x)\ ?​
That's the place to start.

Then use what you've (hopefully) been learning about shifting, stretching, shrinking, flipping, etc. graphs.
 
HallsofIvy said:
e^x goes to 0 very rapidly for x< 0 and goes up very rapidly for x> 0. I would recommend taking x from -1 or -2 to +4 or +5.

ln(x) is only defined for x> 0 so ln(x- 2) is only defined for x> 2. I would recommend taking x from 2 up to, say 10.

Wouldn't it have been faster to just play around with some numbers rather than wait for someone to respond here? Do you not have a graphing calculator? It would have taken only a few seconds to try various value on a calculator.

Thank you, yes, you are right. I think just a lack of confidence in this aspect of Maths. Sorry to be a bother. Regards
 
SammyS said:
I assume you mean \displaystyle y=(-1)e^{-2x}\,, which you could write as y = (e^(-2x))(-1), (the location of parentheses is important) or y = -e^(-2x), or better yet, y = -e-2x,

and y = ln(x-2) + 1 .

Are you familiar with the graphs of:
\displaystyle y=e^{x}\,,​
and
\displaystyle y=\ln(x)\ ?​
That's the place to start.

Then use what you've (hopefully) been learning about shifting, stretching, shrinking, flipping, etc. graphs.

Many thanks, I appreciate the guidance.
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top