Graphing question with Springs and Energy?

AI Thread Summary
In a lab experiment involving springs, the relationship between weight and length is analyzed to determine the spring constant. The conventional approach places weight on the x-axis and length on the y-axis, leading to a graph of Weight vs Length. However, Hooke's Law suggests that plotting Length vs Weight may also be valid, as it reflects the equation F = kx. An alternative suggestion is to plot force (F) against displacement (x), where the slope directly represents the spring constant (k). Ultimately, while different graphing methods can yield useful insights, the choice of axes may depend on the specific context of the analysis.
lu6cifer
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Let's say there's a lab where one hangs weights off a spring, and graphs the length and weight to find the spring constant.


Graphs have the independent variable--weight in this case--on the x axis, and the dependent variable--length--on the y axis. So, by that method, the graph should be Length vs Weight

But when I learned about Hooke's law and whatnot, I saw that the graphs were Weight vs Length, because of F = kx

Which way is the correct convention?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it would be easier if you plotted F versus x. That way the slope of the line would equal k. But it doesn't really matter. If you plotted x versus F, the equation of the line would be x = (1/k)F, so the slope would equal 1/k.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top