Graphing Terminal Velocity using Euler's Method

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating terminal velocity using Euler's Method for a 20kg object shot upward with an initial velocity of 20m/s, considering a drag coefficient of 0.25 and gravity at 9.8m/s². The user is uncertain about the accuracy of their acceleration vs. time graph, particularly regarding a "wiggle" observed around -9.8m/s². Responses indicate that the graph's shape appears correct, with the wiggle reflecting changes in the velocity slope, particularly around t=2 seconds. Suggestions include adjusting the drag coefficient to better visualize the relationship between acceleration and velocity. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding how acceleration curves relate to the slopes of velocity graphs.
jinksys
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
Suppose an object of 20kg is shot upward with an initial velocity of 20m/s. The drag coefficient I've chosen is 0.25, and gravity is 9.8m/s. I'm trying to calculate the terminal velocity using Euler's Method (using a C prog), and then graph the data using openoffice. I know I am converging to the correct terminal velocity, however I'm not confident in my graph of acceleration vs time.

Does this look right?

http://i36.tinypic.com/10p4jmh.png"

Here is my code:
PHP:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <math.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

double accel(double v);
double velocity(double v, double a, double t);


int main()
{
double a,v,t,time;
v=0.0;
t=0.01;
a=1.0;
time=0.0;
printf("Velocity, Acceleration, Time,\n");

while(fabs(a)>0.00001)
	{
	a=accel(v);
	printf("%f, %f, %f,\n",v,a,time);
	v=velocity(v,a,t);
	time+=0.01;
	}

}

double accel(double v)
{

double a,k,g,m;
k=0.25;
g=9.8;
m=20.0;

if(v!=0.0){
	a=(-k*v*v*fabs(v));
	a/=m*v;
	a-=g;
	return a;
	}

	return -9.8;
}

double velocity(double v, double a, double t)
{
v = v + (a * t);
return v;
}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jinksys,

The shape of the curve looks fine to me; was there something in particular that bothered you about it?
 
alphysicist said:
Hi jinksys,

The shape of the curve looks fine to me; was there something in particular that bothered you about it?

Well, my professor said that my graph of velocity vs time http://i38.tinypic.com/51368i.png" is correct. However, since my acceleration is essentially a graph of the velocity's slope, the "wiggle" around -9.8 should represent something on my velocity graph around 0m/s. He's not seeing where I get the wiggle.

So you're saying the graph looks correct? What is causing the wiggle?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jinksys said:
Well, my professor said that my graph of velocity vs time http://i38.tinypic.com/51368i.png" is correct. However, since my acceleration is essentially a graph of the velocity's slope, the "wiggle" around -9.8 should represent something on my velocity graph around 0m/s. He's not seeing where I get the wiggle.

So you're saying the graph looks correct? What is causing the wiggle?


The wiggle on the a vs. t graph occurs at arount t=2, and that corresponds to what is happening at t=2 on the v vs. t graph.

If you look at the acceleration curve, it starts out at about -14.8 or so, and then the wiggle is at -9.8m/s, and then it rapidly goes to zero.

This corresponds to the velocity curve: initially it has a slope of about -14.8; the slope changes to -9.8 around t=2 seconds and the wiggle is showing that that slope stays approximately constant arount t=2 seconds.


I think if you change your drag coefficient to about 2.5, and look at the a and v curve at around t=1 second, it is easier to see what is going on. (Notice that around t=0 the v curve is sloped, around t=1 is approximately straight, and past t=1 it curves again.)



The thing to remember is that the acceleration curve gives the slope of the velocity curve: so these wiggles (which are where the acceleration curves are not changing very much) indicates that the velocity slope is roughly a straight line at that time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top