Gravitation and Circular Orbits

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the energy required to launch a satellite into a circular orbit at a specific altitude, neglecting Earth's rotation. The equation provided relates gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy, emphasizing the need to consider both when determining the total energy required. Participants suggest substituting variables and expanding equations to simplify the problem, with hints to use the work-energy principle. The conversation also touches on the forces involved in circular motion and the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in this context. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
kevi555
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Just a question about gravitation equations:

Neglecting Earth's rotation, show that the energy needed to launch a satellite of mass m into circular orbit at altitude h is equal to:

(\frac {GMm}{R})(\frac{R+2h}{2(R+h)})

Where R = the radius of the Earth and M = the mass of the Earth.

I've tried subbing in r=h+R and it hasn't given me much help.

Any help would be truly appreciated! Thanks all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try expanding the equation and see what you get. (HINT: think W=-\Delta U_g)
 
"W" as in work? or what variable?
 
kevi555 said:
"W" as in work? or what variable?

Work.
 
kevi555 said:
Just a question about gravitation equations:

Neglecting Earth's rotation, show that the energy needed to launch a satellite of mass m into circular orbit at altitude h is equal to:

(\frac {GMm}{R})(\frac{R+2h}{2(R+h)})

Where R = the radius of the Earth and M = the mass of the Earth.

I've tried subbing in r=h+R and it hasn't given me much help.

Any help would be truly appreciated! Thanks all.

What is the force that makes a body go round in a circle? What is supplying that force here? You have to equate the two.
 
Some addition which I didn't bother to mention:

Energy reqd = (PE + KE) in orbit - PE on surface of earth. You have to use the previous concept anyway.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top