Gravitation and Orbiting Satellites

AI Thread Summary
Two satellites orbiting Earth have periods of 1.4 hours and 6.0 hours, with the first satellite at an altitude of 200 km. To find the height of the second satellite, Kepler's Third Law is applied, which relates the periods and radii of the satellites. The calculations require consistent units, emphasizing that all lengths must be in the same measurement system. The initial calculations provided by the user showed confusion over unit conversions and the application of Kepler's laws. Ultimately, the correct approach involves solving for the radius of the second satellite using the established relationship without mixing units.
ThenewKid
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. Two satellites are orbiting around Earth. One satellite has a period of 1.4hours and
is 200km above Earths surface. The other satellite has a period of 6.0h. Use Kepler's laws
and the fact the radius of Earth is 6.37 x 10^6meters to determine the height of the second satellite above Earths surface.




2. Keplers Third Law: (Ta/Tb)^2 = (Ra/Rb)^3
Fg=Gm1m2/r2
G=6.67x10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2
Msv2/r = GMeMs/r^2
g=Fg/m
g=9.80N/kg
g=GMe/Re^2




3. Ok first I know that Fg is equal to Fc, but I don't know the equation to find out Fc.
So I just decided to attempt to find out the period but dividing 6hours by 1.4hours and using that number (4.29 rounded) multipled it with 200km and got 858km. I then used
858km as the height of the 2nd satellite above the Earths surface. I also calculated the velocity of satellite one, which is 7.79 x 10^3 m/s (or just 7.8m/s) Now, since I am doing a long distance course and not good at all at algrebra, and the lack of good example question within the textbook and coursebook to go on, I stumped. The answer I have cannot be worth 5 marks from the work I've shown, but I just can't find any way to prove how my answer is correct with so little to go on.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You will only need to use Kepler's Third Law.
 
ThenewKid said:
2. Keplers Third Law: (Ta/Tb)^2 = (Ra/Rb)^3[/b]

You were given the orbital periods for both satellites, the altitude of one of the satellites, and the radius of the Earth. That information plus Kepler's third law are all you need to solve the problem.
 
So Ta=1.4hours and Tb=6hours
What I got after doing the first part of the equation is 0.054

Now Ra and Rb are pretty much the radius of the Earth, and when I finished
that equation all I got on my calculator was 1E36.
...These numbers don't really seem like the height of the second satellite no matter how
I look at it and add/subtract/multiple/divide them together.
 
Are you using r in meters and T in seconds?
 
ThenewKid said:
So Ta=1.4hours and Tb=6hours
What I got after doing the first part of the equation is 0.054
Good.

Now Ra and Rb are pretty much the radius of the Earth
Not so good.

Solve for Ra (you don't use Kepler's laws here) and then solve for Rb (here you do use Kepler's law).

Roger Wilco said:
Are you using r in meters and T in seconds?
That's not necessary here. The left-hand and right-hand side of the expression (T_a/T_b)^2 = (R_a/R_b)^3 are unitless. If you so wished, you could even express length in furlongs and time in fortnights with this question, so long as all lengths are expressed in furlongs and all times are expressed in fortnights.

What is important in this question is that all similar items (i.e., all lengths) be expressed in the same units. Here we have the radius of the Earth in meters and height in kilometers. Those units must be made commenserate with one another.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top