Gravitation problem (estimate numbers of stars in our galaxy)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating the number of stars in the Milky Way using the sun's mass, its orbital period, and the galaxy's radius. The mass of the galaxy is estimated to be approximately 1.5 trillion times the mass of the sun, leading to a total mass of about 3 E42 kg. Participants suggest using Kepler's third law to relate the period and distance to the center of the galaxy for calculations. There is uncertainty about how to integrate this data to arrive at a discrete number of stars, with the assumption that all stars have a mass equal to that of the sun. The conversation highlights the challenges in applying gravitational principles to estimate stellar populations.
U.Renko
Messages
56
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The sun mass MS = 2.0 E30 kg revolves around the center of the milky way which has a total extension of 2.2 E20 m. The sun takes 2.5 E8 years to complete one revolution. Estimate the number of star in our galaxy based on this data.

Suppose that the distribution is spherically simetric and the sun is in the very outskirts of the galaxy.

Homework Equations



F = \frac{-GmM}{r^2}

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure where to start.
What I did think is use the mass of the galaxy somehow (which I found as result in another exercise, but could be done by Kepler's third law, since we have the period and the distance to center.) MG = 1.5 E12 times the mass of sun = 3 E42 kg.

I feel that I have to integrate something, but how could that give me a discrete number of stars...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi U.Renko! :smile:
U.Renko said:
The sun mass MS = 2.0 E30 kg revolves around the center of the milky way which has a total extension of 2.2 E20 m. The sun takes 2.5 E8 years to complete one revolution. Estimate the number of star in our galaxy based on this data.

Suppose that the distribution is spherically simetric and the sun is in the very outskirts of the galaxy.

I feel that I have to integrate something, but how could that give me a discrete number of stars...

I'll guess that you're supposed to assume that all stars have the same mass as the sun. :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top