Gravitation Problem- Sun and Earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time it would take for the Earth to fall directly into the Sun if its orbit were halted. Key points include the gravitational force between the Earth and Sun, the importance of using the center of mass for accurate calculations, and the changing acceleration as the distance decreases. Participants suggest that applying Kepler's third law simplifies the problem, allowing for a more straightforward solution without complex integration. The conversation emphasizes that treating the scenario as a degenerate orbit can yield valid results, and using the mass ratio of the two bodies is essential for accurate modeling. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the gravitational problem effectively.
Quotexon
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The Earth orbits around the sun because it has angular momentum. If we
stopped the Earth in orbit and then let it fall straight towards the
sun, how long would it take to reach the sun in seconds?

Details and assumptions

The mass of the sun is 2×10^30 kg.
The mass of the Earth is 6×10^24 kg.
Newton's constant is 6.67×10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2.
The Earth is 149,600,000 km from the sun.
You may treat the Earth and sun as point masses.

Homework Equations


F = GMsMe/R^2
center of mass R= (MsRs + MeRe)/(Ms + Me)
d^2r/dt^2 = GMs/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I realized that as these point masses get closer, the distance between them decreases resulting in a stronger force and thus a greater acceleration.
d^2r/dt^2 = GMs/r^2
Since the Sun is also mutually attracted by the Earth and may move slightly, would using the center of mass help in any way?
I'm not sure if this is the right way to approach this. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quotexon said:

Homework Statement


The Earth orbits around the sun because it has angular momentum. If we
stopped the Earth in orbit and then let it fall straight towards the
sun, how long would it take to reach the sun in seconds?

Details and assumptions

The mass of the sun is 2×10^30 kg.
The mass of the Earth is 6×10^24 kg.
Newton's constant is 6.67×10^-11 Nm^2/kg^2.
The Earth is 149,600,000 km from the sun.
You may treat the Earth and sun as point masses.

Homework Equations


F = GMsMe/R^2
center of mass R= (MsRs + MeRe)/(Ms + Me)
d^2r/dt^2 = GMs/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I realized that as these point masses get closer, the distance between them decreases resulting in a stronger force and thus a greater acceleration.
d^2r/dt^2 = GMs/r^2
Since the Sun is also mutually attracted by the Earth and may move slightly, would using the center of mass help in any way?
I'm not sure if this is the right way to approach this. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Yes, using the center of mass of the system will help.

The Earth will collide with the sun when the Earth reaches the center of mass.

Remember, that the r in the Law of universal gravitation is the distance between the two bodies, not Earth's distance from the center of mass.
 
How would I resolve the fact that the acceleration changes over time as a function of the distance decreasing? I'm not too solid on the possible mathematics that that might entail. Thanks very much.
 
Quotexon said:
How would I resolve the fact that the acceleration changes over time as a function of the distance decreasing? I'm not too solid on the possible mathematics that that might entail. Thanks very much.

The hard way is to integrate the differential equation. The easy way is to think about Kepler's third law. How has the semi-major axis of the orbit changed?
 
Multiply both sides by dr/dt, and then integrate the resulting exact derivatives on both sides with respect to t.
 
Dick said:
The hard way is to integrate the differential equation. The easy way is to think about Kepler's third law.

Hello Dick...

Could you please explain how Kepler's third law is applicable in this case .

Dick said:
How has the semi-major axis of the orbit changed?

I think if the Earth is stopped in orbit ,it would fall towards the sun .The sun would also move towards the Earth .Both will collide at their COM .

If the Earth and sun move in a straight line ,they are not in orbit anymore.Then how to answer your question .

I would be grateful if you could explain this concept.
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Hello Dick...

Could you please explain how Kepler's third law is applicable in this case .
I think if the Earth is stopped in orbit ,it would fall towards the sun .The sun would also move towards the Earth .Both will collide at their COM .

If the Earth and sun move in a straight line ,they are not in orbit anymore.Then how to answer your question .

I would be grateful if you could explain this concept.

Sure, but before they collide, you make the pretty good approximation that the sun is infinitely massive and the Earth orbits around it. Or if you want to be a little less sloppy you use the notion of reduced mass, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reduced_mass, to change two body motion into the motion of one body around a fixed potential. Treat the straight line as a degenerate ellipse.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Tanya Sharma said:
If the Earth and sun move in a straight line ,they are not in orbit anymore.
A straight line collision or escape trajectory is still a valid conic section, so the relevant math still applies. These linear cases are sometimes referred to as degenerate orbits.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
yeah, the Kepler's Law method is a much nicer way to find the answer (assuming the mass of the sun is much bigger than the mass of the earth, which it is). and I just checked that it does give the same answer as doing the integration - mostly to reassure myself :) So, if the OP'er is not comfortable using equations with non-constant acceleration, then it's probably best to use the Kepler's third law method.
 
  • #10
There is another live thread on exactly that very same topic where both methods have already been discussed in more detail. I'm not sure about how to link there.
 
Back
Top