Gravitation Q&A: Earth's Acceleration & Planetary Collisions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cyrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the acceleration of the Earth in relation to the Moon's orbit, clarifying that both bodies orbit around their common center of mass, with the Earth experiencing less acceleration due to its greater mass. It explains that when a body approaches Earth, its trajectory determines whether it will collide or become a satellite, based on its specific energy and perigee radius. If the specific energy is less than zero, the object will orbit; if greater, it will be deflected. Calculating the perigee radius helps determine if a collision will occur, with a radius less than Earth's indicating an impending impact. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of gravitational interactions in space.
Cyrus
Messages
3,237
Reaction score
17
Thanks for you help on the first post. I just have two follow up questions. So I understand now that the moons acceleration is part of its circular orbit, but what about the acceleration of the earth. How can I picture that? If I consider the Earth stationary, then the moon orbits the earth, and it would seem that only the moon uses its acceleration vector as centripital. How does the Earth use its acceleration? Also, I was wondering about planetary collisions. Say a body was moving through space and then the Earth got in its way. I would guess that if it was moving straight for the earth, it would smash right into it, speeding up according to Newtons gravitation equation in the process. But what if it is skewed, so that it does not head right for the planet, but perhaps is a little bit off. Is there any easy way to determine if it would become a satelite, or would it be deflected off into space, following a new curve?

Thanks again,

Cyrus
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nothing is stationary on the universe.
 
The moon pulls the earth

cyrusabdollahi said:
So I understand now that the moons acceleration is part of its circular orbit, but what about the acceleration of the earth. How can I picture that? If I consider the Earth stationary, then the moon orbits the earth, and it would seem that only the moon uses its acceleration vector as centripital. How does the Earth use its acceleration?
The Earth accelerates as well, though not as much. (The gravitational pull on each is the same, but the Earth is 81 times as massive as the Moon.) Considering the Earth-Moon as an isolated system, they both orbit around the center of mass of the system, which is located inside the Earth. And that Earth-Moon center of mass is what orbits around the Sun. (Of course this is a simplified model: there are many other factors, as you can imagine.)
 
cyrusabdollahi said:
Also, I was wondering about planetary collisions. Say a body was moving through space and then the Earth got in its way. I would guess that if it was moving straight for the earth, it would smash right into it, speeding up according to Newtons gravitation equation in the process. But what if it is skewed, so that it does not head right for the planet, but perhaps is a little bit off. Is there any easy way to determine if it would become a satelite, or would it be deflected off into space, following a new curve?

Thanks again,

Cyrus
Yes. Assuming it's small, and the Earth is the only other object in the universe, making things a little simpler, you measure the position of the body and the velocity of the body, relative to the Earth. The specific energy of object (energy per unit of mass) is just:

\frac{v^2}{2}-\frac{\mu}{r}=\varepsilon
where v is velocity, r is position and \mu=3.986x10^{5}km^3/sec^2
If the specific energy is less than 0, the object will orbit the Earth's center. If equal to or greater than 0, the object will be deflected into a new curve.

To find out if the object will actually collide with the Earth, or just orbit around it, you need to find the perigee radius. If the object is orbiting the Earth and you just need the distance rather than the exact location, you first find the specific angular momentum using the cross product of the position and velocity:

\vec{h}=\vec{r} \times \vec{v}

Find the magnitude of the angular momentum using the Pythagorean theorem.

Then find the semi-major axis (average distance of the object from the Earth):

a=-\frac{\mu}{2 \varepsilon}

The eccentricity of the orbit is:

e=\sqrt{1+\frac{2 \varepsilon h^2}{\mu^2}}

After all that, it gets easy. The radius of perigee is:

r_p=a(1-e)

Edit: And, finally, if your perigee radius is less than the radius of the Earth, it means the object is going to collide with the Earth.

Toss in the effect of the planets and the Sun, and the problem gets a little more complicated.
 
Last edited:
Thanks a bunch BobG your a real pal! Hemmiiiiiiiii ;-) (I love that one where the guy tells the neighbor, yeah so I told the little lady its got a hemmi, done deal. Meanwhile, he's grillin some food and catches his glove on fire, dunking it into the ice chest, and trys to play it off by saying, thirsty? HA!)
 
cyrusabdollahi said:
Thanks a bunch BobG your a real pal! Hemmiiiiiiiii ;-) (I love that one where the guy tells the neighbor, yeah so I told the little lady its got a hemmi, done deal. Meanwhile, he's grillin some food and catches his glove on fire, dunking it into the ice chest, and trys to play it off by saying, thirsty? HA!)

Actually, I think he says it has a hemi, not a hemmi. Most people who own hemmi's aren't dumb enough to stick their hand in a fire. :smile:

Edit:

This is a hemi: http://www.thehemi.com/

This is a hemmi: http://weblab.research.att.com/~davek/slide/hemmi/postversalogr.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...

Similar threads

Back
Top