B Gravitation with multiple objects by using center of mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the gravitational force exerted on one sphere by three others arranged at the corners of a square. A participant questions the validity of using the center of mass of the other spheres for this calculation, realizing that it leads to inaccuracies. The consensus is that while using the center of mass may seem convenient, it does not account for the gravitational influence of all individual spheres correctly, particularly in cases where symmetry is not maintained. A specific example illustrates that as distances become smaller, the gravitational force calculated using the center of mass can become erroneously large. Ultimately, the correct approach involves calculating the gravitational force from each sphere individually and then vectorially adding those forces.
XSethX
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Four 9.5 kg spheres are located at the corners of a square of side .60 m. Calculate the magnitude and direction of the total gravitational force exerted on one sphere by the other three.

So, essentially my question is, why can I not use center of mass of the other 3 spheres to calculate the gravitational force? I set the top left sphere as my frame of reference, and found the center of mass of the bottom left and top right spheres and calculated the gravitational force at that center of mass on the top left sphere (I narrowed down my error to this part.) Why can I not do this? Thanks in advance!

Edit: Very very sorry, realized I should have posted this in "Introductory Physics Homework"...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure exactly why you can't do it, but I also don't see why you would want to do it. I would calculate the force of gravity from each sphere and add the vectors.
 
By the way, welcome to PF!
 
XSethX said:
I set the top left sphere as my frame of reference, and found the center of mass of the bottom left and top right spheres and calculated the gravitational force at that center of mass on the top left sphere (I narrowed down my error to this part.)

What happened to the bottom right sphere?
 
It won't generally work out if you use center of mass to calculate the resultant gravitational force.
(It is fortunate that it turns out true for planets and such.)
To see why it doesn't make sense as a general rule, consider the following question:
What is the gravitational force at the origin from two identical particles whose positions along some axis are -L+dL and L+dL? We expect (by symmetry) that as we choose smaller dL, the gravitational force should go to zero. Notice though, that the center of mass is a distance dL from the origin; so using your method the gravitational force gets arbitrarily large (we are dividing by dL squared). Clearly incorrect.
 
Drakkith said:
What happened to the bottom right sphere?
I didn't forget, I just calculated that after and added to the number I found. Both times I tried to solve the problem, that value was the same, so I figured my error was with using the center of mass for the bottom left and top right spheres. Thanks!
 
Isaac0427 said:
I'm not sure exactly why you can't do it, but I also don't see why you would want to do it. I would calculate the force of gravity from each sphere and add the vectors.
Yeah, that's how I got the right answer. I was just curious about why using center of mass didn't work. Thanks, though!
 
Nathanael said:
It won't generally work out if you use center of mass to calculate the resultant gravitational force.
(It is fortunate that it turns out true for planets and such.)
To see why it doesn't make sense as a general rule, consider the following question:
What is the gravitational force at the origin from two identical particles whose positions along some axis are -L+dL and L+dL? We expect (by symmetry) that as we choose smaller dL, the gravitational force should go to zero. Notice though, that the center of mass is a distance dL from the origin; so using your method the gravitational force gets arbitrarily large (we are dividing by dL squared). Clearly incorrect.
Oh, I understand now. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top