Gravitational acceleration magnitude - confused

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around gravitational acceleration at different distances from a planet's center, specifically at R/4 and 2R. It highlights confusion regarding why gravitational acceleration is the same at these two points despite their differing distances. The shell theorem is referenced as a key concept in understanding this phenomenon, emphasizing that gravitational acceleration depends on the total mass within a given radius. The conversation clarifies that while acceleration is maximum at the planet's surface and decreases towards the center, there are points outside the sphere where acceleration can match that of points inside. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately calculating gravitational forces in varying contexts.
help6
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Let g be the magnitude of the gravitational acceleration at the surface of a perfectly spherical planet with mass M, radius R, and uniform density. What is the magnitude of gravitational acceleration at a distance R/4 from the center of the planet.
Relevant Equations
I figured the relevant equation would be g=(GM)/r^2
The given answer is g/4. But when I substituted R/4 into the radius, I get 16GM. Am I just using the wrong equation altogether? He also said that you also got g/4 if the distance was 2R.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google "shell theorem".
 
Ibix said:
Google "shell theorem".
I'm sorry, I understand shell theorem, but I still don't get why r/4 and 2r (which is also from the center of the planet) have the same gravitational acceleration. Can you please expound?
 
If you understand the shell theorem you know how to calculate the gravitational acceleration at ##R/4## and you know how to calculate it at ##2R## (note that if you are using ##r## for a radial coordinate it is unwise to also use it for the fixed radius of your sphere - so I am using ##R## for the latter).

Why are they equal? If gravitational acceleration is a maximum at ##r=R## and goes smoothly to zero at ##r=0## and ##r\rightarrow\infty## then there has to be somewhere outside the sphere where the acceleration is equal to any given point inside.
 
Put differently, the M in your relevant equation is the total mass inside of the radius R. Outside of the planet this is always the total mass of the planet but not so inside.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top