Gravitational Acceleration Problem

AI Thread Summary
A 95 kg man exerts a force of 1000 N on a scale in a stationary elevator, prompting a calculation of his acceleration. Using Newton's second law, the net force must consider both the upward force from the scale and the downward force of gravity. The correct equation is F(normal) - F(gravity) = ma, leading to a net force of 69 N upward. This results in an acceleration of approximately 0.73 m/s², which is significantly less than Earth's gravitational acceleration of 9.8 m/s². The discussion highlights the importance of accounting for all forces when calculating acceleration.
BandGeek13
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 95 kg man jumps, therefore exerting a force of 1000 N on a bathroom scale. The scale is in a motionless elevator in Earth's gravity. What is the man's acceleration?


Homework Equations


Newton's 2nd Law: F=ma
Possibly Fg=mg ?


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried just using F=ma.
therefore, it'd be:
1000 N=(95kg)(a)
a=10 m/s^2

But this does not take into consideration the Earth's gravity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

"F=ma" uses the net force (vector sum of all forces acting on the man)

Your F uses the 1000N force that the scale exerts on the man. As you suspect, you need to add the force due to Earth's gravity. Just take the vector sum of the scale force and the force due to gravity.
 
So would it be:

F(normal)-F(gravity)=ma
F(normal) - mg=ma
1000 N [up] - (95 kg)(9.8 N/kg [down])=(95 kg)(a)
1000 N [up] - 931 N [down] = (95 kg)(a)
69 N [up] = (95 kg)(a)
0.73 m/s^2 = a

This seems very low..
 
wait!

instead of:
69 N [up] = (95 kg)(a)
0.73 m/s^2 = a

is it:
1931 N [up] = (95 kg)(a)
20. m/s^2 = a
 
BandGeek13 said:
So would it be:
.
.
.
0.73 m/s^2 = a

This seems very low..

Looks good to me.

Note, the man's weight is about 930 N, so the scale would read 930 N when a=0.

The scale reading of 1000N is not much more than this, so expect a to be considerably less than g=9.8 m/s^2.

An acceleration of g=9.8 m/s^2 upward would require a scale reading of 2*930N, which would give Fnet = +930 N upward.

EDIT:
BandGeek13 said:
wait!
.
.
.
is it:
1931 N [up] = (95 kg)(a)
20. m/s^2 = a

Nope. We have +1000N (upward) and -931N (downward), for Fnet=31N upward
 
Alright.
Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top