B Gravitational Collapse: Internal Energy & Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
During gravitational collapse, gravitational potential energy is transformed into internal kinetic energy, increasing the internal energy of the gas cloud. Internal energy, in thermodynamic terms, typically excludes gravitational potential energy, allowing for this conversion without violating energy conservation. Total energy remains conserved, but internal energy does not have to be constant, as it can change through processes like nuclear reactions or radiation. For gravitational collapse to continue, a decrease in total energy is necessary, often requiring heat loss from the system. Thus, while gravitational potential energy can be part of internal energy in specific contexts, it is not included when considering energy exchanges in a collapsing system.
mystreet123
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
During gravitational collapse, gravitational potential energy of the gas is converted to its internal kinetic energy so the internal energy of the clous of gas is said to be increased

But isn't gravitational potential energy included in the internal energy? Shouldn't the internal energy remains constant overall?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
"Internal energy", in this context, refers to the thermodynamic definition.
This does not usually include gravitational potential energy.
You can see this, if you like, as one form of internal energy turning into another form.

Total energy is conserved - internal energy does not have to be conserved.
For instance, the object could undergo some nuclear reactions increasing internal energy or the object could radiate, decreasing internal energy.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes davenn and mystreet123
Simon Bridge said:
"Internal energy", in this context, refers to the thermodynamic definition.
This does not usually include gravitational potential energy.
You can see this, if you like, as one form of internal energy turning into another form.

Total energy is conserved - internal energy does not have to be conserved.
For instance, the object could undergo some nuclear reactions increasing internal energy or the object could radiate, decreasing internal energy.
Thanks Simon

not my field of expertise ... was interested in hearing an answer as well :smile:

D
 
  • Like
Likes Simon Bridge
Another interesting point about gravitational collapse is that to keep it going, it generally does require a decrease in the system total energy ("internal" energy plus potential energy). Whenever gravitational energy is converted 100% into internal energy, it will eventually stop the collapse, so you need some heat loss from the system to keep it going. But it takes relatively little heat loss if the gas is relativistic, so that's why gravitational collapse happens for relativistic gases.
 
mystreet123 said:
But isn't gravitational potential energy included in the internal energy?

Yes, but only if it is no potential energy in an external field.

mystreet123 said:
Shouldn't the internal energy remains constant overall?

Yes, but only if no heat or work is exchanged over the system boundaries.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top