Gravitational field intensity at the center of the earth

AI Thread Summary
The gravitational field intensity at the center of the Earth is zero due to the surrounding mass exerting equal gravitational forces in all directions, resulting in a net force of zero. When calculating gravitational field intensity using the formula, substituting zero for the radius leads to an undefined value, but this is a misapplication of Newton's law. The gravitational acceleration inside a spherical shell is zero, meaning only the mass closer to the center contributes to the gravitational field. As the radius approaches zero, the mass inside also approaches zero, confirming that gravitational acceleration at the center is zero. Understanding these principles clarifies why the gravitational field intensity is zero at the Earth's center.
I Like Pi
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



what is the gravitational field intensity at the center of the earth

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i was told that it was zero because you have the Earth's mass surrounding it, and graivty moves to the center of its mass (center of radius) therefore the net force would be zero? is this correct?

also if you sub in 0 in the gravitational field intensity formula for the radius, you get a value over zero, meaning it is undefined... so i can't really use that to support why it is zero at the center...

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I Like Pi said:
i was told that it was zero because you have the Earth's mass surrounding it, and graivty moves to the center of its mass (center of radius) therefore the net force would be zero? is this correct?
Yes - in simple terms, ignoring the moon and tidal effects

also if you sub in 0 in the gravitational field intensity formula for the radius, you get a value over zero, meaning it is undefined
You also have zero mass inside that radius so it's zero/zero.
In fact you should be thinking about 'r' as the distance to each bit of mass above you - and since the Earth is all around you there is an equal force in every direction out from the centre - hence zero overall field
 
Last edited:
I Like Pi said:
i was told that it was zero because you have the Earth's mass surrounding it, and graivty moves to the center of its mass (center of radius) therefore the net force would be zero? is this correct?
You presumably are asking about gravitational acceleration, and yes, this is correct. A reasonably good model for the Earth is that it is a sphere whose density is a function of distance from the center of the Earth (and nothing else). With this model, the gravitation acceleration at some point inside the surface of the Earth depends only on that portion of the Earth that is closer to the center of the Earth than is the point in question. Imagine dividing the Earth into two parts, one part being the portion of the Earth closer to the center of the Earth than the point in question and the other part being the portion of the Earth from from the center of the Earth than the point in question. The gravitational acceleration at the point in question is the sum of the gravitational acceleration toward the inner part plus the gravitational acceleration toward the outer part. The contribution of the outer portion is identically zero because the gravitational acceleration anywhere inside a spherical shell of mass is identically zero. All that remains is the contribution from the inner portion,

a(r) = \frac{GM_{\text{inner}}}{r^2}

where Minner is the mass of that inner portion.

also if you sub in 0 in the gravitational field intensity formula for the radius, you get a value over zero, meaning it is undefined... so i can't really use that to support why it is zero at the center...
That's because you are using Newton's law incorrectly. The correct usage is to only use the mass at or below the point in question.

If the density of the Earth is finite at every point inside the Earth, including at the center, then as r approaches zero, the inner mass will approach zero much faster than will r2. That in turn means that a(r)→0 as r→0.
 
Thank you very much! You have both helped! I really appreciate it!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top