Gravitational field intensity (help)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving an equation that relates the force of gravity, mass, and gravitational field intensity based on experimental data. The recorded forces for various weights indicate a direct proportionality, suggesting that the force (F) equals the mass (m) multiplied by gravitational field intensity (g), or F = mg. The constant ratio of force to mass across different weights implies that gravitational field intensity remains constant at approximately 10 N/kg on Earth. The conversation hints at modifying the equation for different gravitational conditions on other planets by incorporating a variable for the planet's gravity. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving the assignment effectively.
waxer1987
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have this assignment in physics class and I'm stuck on this 1 question.

What we were doing: We were hanging 0.10kg, 0.20kg weights etc.. on a Newton scale and we were recording the force of gravity. For 0.10kg I recorded 1 N, 0.20kg was 2 N, and so on until 1kg was 10 N.

So the question is: Write and equation relating force of gravity, mass, and the numerical value of the gravitational field intensity of Earth from this activity.

I was thinking Fnet = ma, so 1 N = 0.10kg a. Probably way off.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hints:

Can you think of a simple arithmetic expression that always remains constant for any of the experiments you did? For example, is the product of the mass and the force a constant for all the experiments? Is the ratio of the mass and force always constant? No need to think about the sum or difference--you never add or subtract values of different units! (You don't add apples and seconds!)

Once you've discovered an expression that remains constant for all the experiments, imagine what would happen on a planet that had, say, twice Earth's gravity and how you'd need to change your expression so that it worked on that planet. Then think of how you might add one more variable to the expression, who's value would indicate the gravity of the planet.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top