Gravitational field strength (ratios)

AI Thread Summary
A 6.2*10^2-kg satellite experiences a gravitational field strength of 4.5-N/kg above Earth's surface, prompting a calculation of its altitude using gravitational ratios. The gravitational field strength at Earth's surface is 9.8-N/kg, and Earth's radius is 6.37*10^6 m. The initial calculation incorrectly applied the ratio, leading to an altitude of 4.3*10^6 m instead of the correct 3.0*10^6 m. The gravitational field strength is inversely proportional to the square of the radius, indicating that the smaller distance should be on top in the ratio. Understanding this relationship clarified the mistake in the calculation, emphasizing the importance of correctly interpreting the problem's requirements.
HerroFish
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 6.2*10^2-kg satellite above Earth's surface experiences a gravitational field strength of magnitude 4.5-N/kg. Knowing the gravitational field strength at Earth's surface and Earth's radius, how far above Earth's surface is the satellite? (Use ratio and proportion.)


Homework Equations



Fg = (GMm)/r2
g = GM/r2
gE = 9.8-N/Kg
rE = 6.37*10^6-m


The Attempt at a Solution



gs/gE = rs2/rE2
rs= √((rE2gs)/gE)

and my answer comes out to be 4.3*10^6-m. But the answer at the back of the book is 3.0*10^6-m, what did I do wrong? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The field strength is INVERSELY proportional to the square of the radius. So it should be

gs/gE = rE2/rs2

which is the reciprocal of what you had on the right hand side.

Think about it: for gs ,the rs is on the bottom, and for 1/gE, the rE is on top. It also makes intuitive sense. We know gs is smaller than gE, so the ratio should have the smaller distance on top.
 
Don't forget, also that rs is the distance between the satellite and the centre of its orbit, which is not quite what the problem is asking for.
 
ah that make sense, thanks for everything!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top