Gravitational force on an astronaut from a nearby massive torus

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the gravitational force between an astronaut and a massive torus, the relevant equation is F=G*m*M/r². The astronaut is positioned 1*R away from the top of the ring, not 2*R as initially stated. The discussion highlights the distinction between a "thin ring" and a "thin circle," with clarification that a ring is a curve while a circle refers to a two-dimensional shape. Participants suggest that if the user can derive gravitational forces for simpler shapes, extending that understanding to a cylindrical shape should be manageable. The conversation also notes a mislabeling of the object as a torus, which adds confusion to the problem.
srecko97
Messages
82
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


There are a big object and an astronaut in space. How do we calculate the gravitational force between them. I enclose a photo. I have given the mass of an astronaut, the dimensions of this giant ring and density of the ring. There is also a mistake in the photo. The astronaut is not 2*R away, but only 1*R away from the top of the ring.
homework.jpg
2. Relevant equation
F=G*m*M/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


I do not know how to start solivng it. I know how to calculate the force between a point and a thin ring and between a point and a thin circle... but this homework is really hard for me. I would be greatful if I got any key ideas or maybe some beginnings of solution. Help me please!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the difference between a "thin ring" and a "thin circle"? To me, they mean the same thing, but you apparently think of them differently, so I'm looking for a bit of clarification in what you meant by those terms.
 
  • Like
Likes srecko97
And when you say you "know how to calculate the force" between a point and one of those those two objects, does that mean you simply know the formulas, or that you know how to derive them from F = GMm/r2 via integration?
 
  • Like
Likes srecko97
I meant circle as a 2 dimensional shape with surface and ring as a curve. Yes, i know how to derive these formlas via integration, but this problem seems much harder.
 
srecko97 said:
I meant circle as a 2 dimensional shape with surface and ring as a curve. Yes, i know how to derive these formlas via integration, but this problem seems much harder.

Much harder? If you know how to integrate to get the force for a single slice then you just need to integrate all the slices in the third dimension.
 
srecko97 said:
I meant circle as a 2 dimensional shape with surface and ring as a curve. Yes, i know how to derive these formlas via integration, but this problem seems much harder.
Disk might be a better word to use than circle.

As Cutter has implied, if you really understand how to derive the other results, solving this problem should be relatively straightforward. I'm guessing you were shown the derivation for the ring and possibly how that result was used to get the formula for the disk. You want to do essentially the same thing here. Try deriving the result for a cylinder without the hole in the middle. Show us what you've tried so far.
 
Thanks
 
wow I was doing the same problem, check my thread maybe it helps. Also this isn't a torus. That would be way more fun though.
 
Thanks, redivider. I know it is not a torus, but one of the administrators obviously thinks so, as the title was changed.
 
Back
Top