Gravitational potential between two massive particles....

AI Thread Summary
All particles generate gravitational fields, and the gravitational potential energy between two bodies is described by the equation U = -GMm/r. As two massive particles, like Z bosons, approach each other, their gravitational potential energy increases and becomes infinite as the distance approaches zero. However, reaching a stationary state at r = 0 is impossible in quantum mechanics, which contradicts the classical view of infinite mass. The total energy of the system remains constant, with potential energy decreasing as kinetic energy increases. Mixing Newtonian and relativistic mechanics complicates the understanding of these interactions.
R. E. Nettleton
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
If my understanding is correct, all particles are sources of gravitational fields (albeit minor ones), and the gravitational potential energy between two bodies is given by:
U = -GMm/r

So, if we have two Z bosons (or any other bosons with mass but no repulsion due to charge) which are traveling toward one another and pass through the same space, their gravitational potential energies would increase as the distance between them approaches 0 -- and at 0, the value would be infinite. In accordance with E=mc2, this would result in an increase of mass, tending to infinity.

However, infinitely massive particles seems implausible. Which part of this is incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking "Is the classical gravitational potential at r = 0 infinite?"?

The answer is yes. But it's also true that quantum mechanically you cannot reach a stationary state with r = 0.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Are you asking "Is the classical gravitational potential at r = 0 infinite?"?

The answer is yes. But it's also true that quantum mechanically you cannot reach a stationary state with r = 0.
Thanks. Does this increase in gravitational potential lead to a temporary increase in mass?
 
R. E. Nettleton said:
If my understanding is correct, all particles are sources of gravitational fields (albeit minor ones), and the gravitational potential energy between two bodies is given by:
U = -GMm/r

So, if we have two Z bosons (or any other bosons with mass but no repulsion due to charge) which are traveling toward one another and pass through the same space, their gravitational potential energies would increase as the distance between them approaches 0 -- and at 0, the value would be infinite. In accordance with E=mc2, this would result in an increase of mass, tending to infinity.

However, infinitely massive particles seems implausible. Which part of this is incorrect?

The GPE decreases as the particles get closer. In the classical model, this is compensated for by an increase in kinetic energy. The total energy of the system remains constant.
 
  • Like
Likes stoomart
R. E. Nettleton said:
Does this increase in gravitational potential lead to a temporary increase in mass?

Your mixing Newtonian and relativistic mechanics here. The only thing that will make is a mess.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top