Gravitational potential energy of a cylinder to a particle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the gravitational potential energy of a particle near a cylinder, with specific focus on the geometry of the cylinder affecting the gravitational force. A participant questions the necessity of using calculus, suggesting that the mass of the cylinder can be derived from its volume and density without complex integration. However, it is clarified that the gravitational force from a cylinder differs from that of a sphere or point mass, emphasizing the importance of geometry in the calculations. The conversation also highlights the need to establish a clear coordinate system for accurate measurements. Overall, understanding the unique gravitational characteristics of a cylinder is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Gian Lukmana
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone I'm kinda new here, your support will really be appreciated ! :D

1. Homework Statement

Let's say the cylinder has radius R, and height T.

Homework Equations


U = ∫GmdM/x

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is shown in the picture, I took a tiny element of the cylinder with vertical distance y, and horizontal distance r from the particle, then I used integral. am I doing this right ? I think there's something odd with the "y" there. Should I range the y until the upper surface of the cylinder only?
1902777_10205435664597512_708160216152778767_n.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you need calculus for this? The volume of a cylinder can be looked up so if you have the density of the material, you can get the mass of the cylinder and the center of mass is trivially easy to get so if you have the mass of the particle, just plug everything into the gravity formula. Am I missing something about what you are trying to do?
 
phinds said:
Why would you need calculus for this? The volume of a cylinder can be looked up so if you have the density of the material, you can get the mass of the cylinder and the center of mass is trivially easy to get so if you have the mass of the particle, just plug everything into the gravity formula. Am I missing something about what you are trying to do?
The gravitational force due to a cylinder is not the same as that due to a sphere or point mass of the same mass. Geometry matters.

One approach would be to begin by finding the force exerted by a thin disk at a given distance, then treat the cylinder as a stack of such disks of thickness dy.
 
  • Like
Likes Thewindyfan
Yeah, I heard that we can't treat other shapes as a sphere, so we can't just blindly use the normal formula. To confirm, does this mean y should be the distance of the particle and the upper surface of the cylinder ?
 
Gian Lukmana said:
Yeah, I heard that we can't treat other shapes as a sphere, so we can't just blindly use the normal formula. To confirm, does this mean y should be the distance of the particle and the upper surface of the cylinder ?
I think it's up to you to specify your coordinate system and significant measurements, but it would probably make sense to characterize the setup by specifying distance of the test mass from the near end of the cylinder.
 
  • Like
Likes Gian Lukmana
alright, got it now, thank you so much !
 
gneill said:
The gravitational force due to a cylinder is not the same as that due to a sphere or point mass of the same mass. Geometry matters.
OOPS. Guess I didn't think that one through.
 
Back
Top