Gravitational potential energy

AI Thread Summary
The gravitational potential energy of a ball at a distance r from the Earth's center is negative because it reflects the attractive nature of gravity, which seeks to minimize distance. The equation U_grav(r) = -GMm/r indicates that potential energy decreases as the ball approaches the Earth. The work done by gravity is negative since the force and displacement are in the same direction, leading to a negative change in potential energy. The zero level for gravitational potential is conventionally set at infinity, making potential energy negative as the object moves closer to the Earth. Understanding these concepts clarifies why gravitational potential energy is defined this way.
bigplanet401
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Why is the gravitational potential energy of a ball a distance r from the center of the Earth negative?

Homework Equations


<br /> U_\text{grav}(r) = - GMm/r<br />[/B]

(To me, this makes sense because gravity is an attractive force and bodies will want to minimize the distance between them if only gravity is acting.)

The Attempt at a Solution



The force of gravity is given by Newton's universal law, so I'm thinking the potential energy due to this force is the negative of the work done on the ball by gravity over a distance, or
<br /> \Delta U = -W = - \int_{r_1}^{r_2} \; \mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{dr} <br />

since the force and the displacement are in the same direction,

<br /> \Delta U = -W = + \frac{GMm}{r}\vert^{r_2}_{r_1} <br />


if r1 is at infinity and r2 is equal to r,
<br /> \Delta U = +\frac{GMm}{r}<br />


What did I do wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First decide whether the force vector should be written as ##\mathbf{F} = + \frac{GMm}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}## or as ##\mathbf{F} = - \frac{GMm}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}##.

Then think about whether ##\hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \mathbf{dr} = dr## or ##\hat{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \mathbf{dr} =-dr##
 
Oh...minus sign! That makes since because the force of gravity is directed to the center of the Earth, in the -r^ direction. Thanks!
 
I would have answered the stated question in a completely different way.
The zero level in a potential field is, in general, arbitrary. For practical purposes, all that matters is the potential differences between points. The choice of where to set the zero is either up to the individual or a matter of convention.
For gravitational potential, the convention is that it is zero at infinity. I leave you to complete the explanation from there.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top