B Gravitational wave signal duration

AI Thread Summary
The duration of the gravitational wave signal detected by LIGO was approximately 0.25 seconds, during which the frequency of the waves increased as the binary black holes spiraled closer together. This increase in frequency is due to the loss of angular momentum, which converts to gravitational waves of higher energy as the black holes approach. The gravitational waves become detectable once the black holes are close enough, and the signal ends upon their merger. The frequency is also subject to redshift as it travels through the expanding universe. Overall, the rapid increase in frequency reflects the dynamics of the black hole merger process.
jordankonisky
Messages
41
Reaction score
3
I have a question about why the duration of the gravitational wave signal detected by LIGO was 0.25 seconds or so. I think I understand correctly that as the two binary black holes rotate around each other and move closer together there is a loss of angular momentum that is converted to gravitational waves of a certain frequency. The generation of gravitational waves would then end upon the merging of the two black holes. My questions are: is the frequency of the gravitation wave constant throughout the entire history of the black hole merger? Is this frequency red-shifted in the gravitational wave’s journey from its source to the LIGO instrument due to the expansion of the universe? Why is the duration of the signal 0.25 seconds?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The frequency rapidly increased as the objects moved closer together. It would be redshifted. It started once the objects got close enough that their gravitational waves became sufficiently energetic to be detectable at this distance, and stopped once the objects merged and settled into a single spinning object.

For more information and links to other sources, see this Wikipedia entry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_observation_of_gravitational_waves
 
Jonathan Scott said:
The frequency rapidly increased as the objects moved closer together. It would be redshifted. It started once the objects got close enough that their gravitational waves became sufficiently energetic to be detectable at this distance, and stopped once the objects merged and settled into a single spinning object.

For more information and links to other sources, see this Wikipedia entry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_observation_of_gravitational_waves
So the quantum wave frequency over the duration of the pulse detected by LIGO increase over its 0.25 duration?
Jonathan Scott said:
The frequency rapidly increased as the objects moved closer together. It would be redshifted. It started once the objects got close enough that their gravitational waves became sufficiently energetic to be detectable at this distance, and stopped once the objects merged and settled into a single spinning object.

For more information and links to other sources, see this Wikipedia entry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_observation_of_gravitational_waves
So the frequency of the gravitational wave increases during the approximately 0.25 second duration of the signal being detected by LIGO?
 
jordankonisky said:
So the quantum wave frequency over the duration of the pulse detected by LIGO increase over its 0.25 duration?
There's nothing quantum about it. The energy of a gravitational wave increases rapidly as the objects get closer (so the gravity is stronger and the rate of change is much faster).

jordankonisky said:
So the frequency of the gravitational wave increases during the approximately 0.25 second duration of the signal being detected by LIGO?
Yes, I just said that. You can see a graph of the wave as observed at each detector and the corresponding theoretical prediction in the Wikipedia entry.
 
Jonathan Scott said:
There's nothing quantum about it. The energy of a gravitational wave increases rapidly as the objects get closer (so the gravity is stronger and the rate of change is much faster).Yes, I just said that. You can see a graph of the wave as observed at each detector and the corresponding theoretical prediction in the Wikipedia entry.
Got it. I very much appreciate your responses to my questions.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top