Gravity and Angular acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular speed required for a lander to simulate Europa's gravity using a rotating arm in an Earth satellite. The key equations involve centripetal acceleration and gravitational force, with participants noting the need to convert Europa's diameter from kilometers to meters for accurate calculations. There are concerns about dimensional consistency in the equations used, particularly in equating centripetal acceleration to gravitational acceleration. Suggestions are made to clarify the relationship between angular velocity and centripetal acceleration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise calculations and understanding the underlying physics principles.
sreya
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is strong evidence that Europa, a satellite of Jupiter, has a liquid ocean beneath its icy surface. Many scientists think we should land a vehicle there to search for life. Before launching it, we would want to test such a lander under the gravity conditions at the surface of Europa. One way to do this is to put the lander at the end of a rotating arm in an orbiting Earth satellite.

If the arm is 5.25m long and pivots about one end, at what angular speed (in rpm) should it spin so that the acceleration of the lander is the same as the acceleration due to gravity at the surface of Europa? The mass of Europa is 4.8E22kg and its diameter is 3138 km.

\omega =_____rpm

Homework Equations



v=\omega r

\frac{GMm}{R^2}=a

T = \frac{2\pi}{\omega}

The Attempt at a Solution



\frac{GMm}{R^2}=a

\frac{mv^2}{R}=ma

\frac{\omega^2R}{a}

\omega=\sqrt{\frac{a}{R}}

\omega=\sqrt{\frac{GM}{R_{europa}^2*R_{sat}}}

\frac{60\omega}{2\pi} = x rpm

Edit: Figured out the problem. The diameter of Europa is given in Km, you have to convert it to meters. Stupid Mastering Physics...

Apparently that's not right though??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
sreya said:
\frac{GMm}{R^2}=a
... this is not correct: dimensions don't match.

Your reasoning is unclear - you seem to want to put the centripetal acceleration of the station centrifuge equal to the acceleration due to gravity at the surface of Europa.

Try writing centripetal acceleration in terms of angular velocity.
 
Sorry that should be
\frac{GMm}{R^2}=g_{europa}

Which "technically" is still acceleration but that wasn't clear
 
Still not correct.
Dimension still don't match.

Does the acceleration of gravity depend on the mass of the object falling?
Hint: leaning tower of Pisa.

What about writing centripetal acceleration in terms of angular velocity?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top