Gravity of Black Holes: What Escapes and What Doesn't?

AI Thread Summary
Black holes significantly bend spacetime, especially at their singularities, where the curvature approaches infinity. The event horizon marks the boundary beyond which light cannot escape, suggesting that theoretically, particles moving faster than light could escape. However, according to the theory of relativity, nothing can exceed the speed of light, complicating this notion. The discussion also touches on Hawking radiation, which is a form of radiation emitted by black holes, raising questions about its nature and whether it could involve particles unaffected by spacetime curvature. Overall, the understanding of black holes and their effects on spacetime remains a complex and evolving area of study.
Ghost of Progress
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Recently someone told me that Black holes give off some sort of radiation and that this radiation, in escaping the black hole, must be traveling at faster than the speed of light.
The biggest thing that I'm unsure of is just how much a black hole bends space. Does it curve it just sharply enough so that light can't escape but,in theory, somthing going faster than light might be able to? Or does it curve space into itself so that if something was trying to move out from a black hole even at an infinate speed it could not do it.
then this brings up a second thought. If a black hole bends space back into itself wouldn't this make a closed sphere that nothing could enter.
And finaly - if it's true that there is some kind of radiation coming from black holes maybe instead of trying to figure out how it's going faster than light we could think that it's some particle that's unaffected by curves in 3D space.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I just did some more reading and realized this was really a question about Hawking radiation.
Any answers on the question of just how much a black hole can curve space would still be appreciated - thanks.
 
Partial answer, and I'm shootinig from the hip.

I think it can fairly be said that the more massive the black hole, the less it bends spacetime at its event horizon. That may seem a little bit counter to your intuition.
 
Originally posted by Ghost of Progress
The biggest thing that I'm unsure of is just how much a black hole bends space. Does it curve it just sharply enough so that light can't escape but,in theory, somthing going faster than light might be able to? Or does it curve space into itself so that if something was trying to move out from a black hole even at an infinate speed it could not do it.
Well, a black hole bends space a lot. At the singularity the curvature of space is infinite or close to infinite, depending on which physicist you tend to agree more.

A black hole can roughly be defined as everything inside its event horizon. The event horizon is where light cannot escape anymore (hence the "black" hole). So, a particle moving faster than light should be able to escape the event horizon. However, I must remind you that the theory of relativity is based on the assumption that nothing can move faster than light.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top