Gravity Pull: Calculating Time to Impact

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time it takes for two objects to collide under gravity when they start at rest and are a distance r apart. The initial query involves whether the mass of both objects should be considered, leading to the application of a modified version of Kepler's third law. When both masses are significant, the total mass is used in the formula to determine the fall time. A differential equation approach was also mentioned, but the modified orbital period formula is deemed sufficient for this scenario. Understanding these calculations is crucial for accurately predicting gravitational interactions.
O-r-i-o-n
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
There are two objects with the distance of r apart .
because of the gravity , these two objects start to get closer to each other and then they get to each other (actually they fall on each other) .So my question is how long does it take for them to get to each other?
Thank you
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Do the two objects start at rest?

Is this a homework problem?
 
Yes , their initial velocity is zero .
No it's not a homework , the teacher told us how to use Kepler's third law for a big fall like this (for example an asteroid falls to the sun) but in those kinds of cases one object is a lot heavier than the other one.
so this question popped in my head what if you can't ignore the small object's mass?
thanks
 
If you can't ignore the mass of one of the objects, then you need to use a modified form of the orbital period formula where you add the masses together (where you normally would have "M", you substitute (M+m). Then take half of the orbital period to get your fall time.
 
Good , I didn't think of that , thanks
but once someone solved this but I was too young to understand what he did
He was trying to solve the " m\ddot{r}=-gMm/r^2 " differential equation , but I guess your solution is good , too . Thanks
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top