Gravity & Spacetime Curvature: Have I Understood?

slibbfalusken
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
When spacetime is not bent the two objects, red ball and blue ball, will move strait up the y-axis as they move through time. (Space is x and time is y).
Spacetime1.png

Now I've made the assumption that either a) All things want to move the smallest possible distance to the next point in time or b) all objects move 90 degrees relative to the rotation (Curvature) of the space in their coordinates. These two assumptions give the same result. As you can see in the picture below the blue ball is now heavy and has curved space significantly. Where the red ball is the time is now pointing a bit to the left. As the two objects move through time they will now meet in one point.
Spacetime2.png

Is this what gravity is or have I missunderstood it? If not I'd be really glad if someone could show me a 2d picture of spacetime and how it actually works.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
slibbfalusken said:
If not I'd be really glad if someone could show me a 2d picture of spacetime and how it actually works.



 
But is spacetime really curved relative to the object itself? If I jump 1 meter up and down spacetime, in relation to me, is not going to change right? That video only makes sense to me if light or something travels next to a star or something and changes its path due to it actually traveling so far that the change in spacetime angle matters.

Also that curvature is weird. Is the planet supposed to be at the bottom? How on Earth is the curve spaced around it? I just can't picture it.

Hm if I go in from another angle I perhaps can see the point. The planet makes, from the apples perspective, the next frame in time slightly bended a few degrees. Though this can't really be imagined from an outsider perspective.

So, I don't think I fully understood just by watching those videos. I mean, I see why the ball is moving down but I don't understand the curvature itself.
 
slibbfalusken said:
So, I don't think I fully understood just by watching those videos.
Try the links in the video description of the second video (on youtube).
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top