I Gravity Wave Propagation: Negative Energy Pulse?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the characteristics of gravitational waves, particularly regarding a simulation that shows a potential negative gravitational "spike" during singularity merging. Participants clarify that the term "gravity waves" is incorrect; the proper terminology is "gravitational waves." They emphasize that simulations cannot fully capture the complexities of gravitational wave behavior, as they are lower-dimensional representations. The concept of an "opposite metric" is questioned, with the understanding that spacetime metrics are Lorentzian by nature. The behavior of spacetime during wave propagation, including whether it reverts to normal flatness or exceeds it, is contingent on the specific shape of the gravitational wave.
desertsoldier39
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
First year Astronomy and planetary sciences student. Have some questions when looking at G-wave propagation and formation simulations.
At 0:51 in this simulation video there seems to be a brief moment upon merging that these singularities produce what appears to be negative gravitational "Spike?" that seems to bulge spacetime in an opposite metric compared to normal spacetime flatness. Is this a quirk of the simulation or is this a pulse of negative energy?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I also have a second question above G-waves themselves. They appear to be propagating waves of contracting and expanding spacetime. When spacetime contracts at the leading edge of the wave and then expands, does the expansion revert back to normal spacetime flatness or is there a momentary expansion beyond that metric?
 
First, nomenclature: it is gravitational waves, not gravity waves. Gravity waves are things like waves on a water surface.

Second, you cannot really learn much about gravitational waves by watching simulations like this, which will always be some lower dimensional representation of the full simulation.

It is not clear to me what you would mean by ”opposite metric”. The metric of a spacetime is by construction Lorentzian everywhere.

In particular coordinate systems, gravitational waves may be described as space expanding and contracting (not spacetime, which is what it is - time is a part of it so it does not actually do anything). However, that is a coordinate dependent interpretation requiring you to make particular choices of coordinates and assign them the space and time labels.

desertsoldier39 said:
When spacetime contracts at the leading edge of the wave and then expands, does the expansion revert back to normal spacetime flatness or is there a momentary expansion beyond that metric?
This completely depends on the shape of the wave - as for any wave, gravitational waves are governed by the wave equation.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...